29 Comments
User's avatar
Hereticdrummer's avatar

It's definitely a psy-op and Freemasonic theater. Weapons of mass distraction. Lindsay Clancy is a state/Intel actor and a male to female, transsexual androgyne, like they all are.

TomNass's avatar

You always bring light to a confusing situation. At this point I don’t know what to believe about this case.

Anthony Freda's avatar

Smells like a psyop fpr sure.

Moebius Infinity's avatar

'Ai ai ai'

AI AI AI

--- Claude Grok

Freya Moon's avatar

Seems to be the same case w the Charlie Kirk murder. This happens every day to Black lives.

Maggie V's avatar

It is as real as George Floyd was.

And again, the masses feel for the entire theater show.

Divide and Distract. Keep the masses fighting each other.

Steal $100,000s in donation dollars from the stupid masses.

They are laughing their asses off at us.

DawnieR's avatar

You're probably 100% correct!

The THEATRE that 'THEY' give us, on a daily (HOURLY) basis......has gone off the charts!

Caleb Cooper's avatar

The point of all these public spectacles like this is one thing only: energy.

Don’t ever “give” your attention away freely. Attention is mental energy. I see many people get wrapped in these things emotionally and it affects them. Don’t let things like this, as fucked up as they are real or fake steal your energy.

Dr.Don Hall's avatar

Real! Mother Infanticide is Spiraling Upwards.Hundreds of Real Unreported similar cases should receive this level of attention. Psychosis exists. Drugs Are Involved in 99.9% of Cases.

In 1994, Susan Smith's murder of her sons Michael and Alex made national headlines for months. A couple of factors explain why the Susan Smith case received such high-profile coverage. One factor was Smith's overt racism. Smith initially made up a story about having been carjacked by an African-American man in order to explain the disappearance of her sons. The media, all too ready to believe her horror story, had made it front page news all over the country. Having covered the story of the "carjacking" and the boys' disappearance for 9 days, the media couldn't easily drop the story when it was discovered that Smith had actually strapped her three-year old and one-year old sons into their carseats and then driven her car into a lake to drown them. Furthermore, when it came out that Smith's reason for killing the boys was because she dreamed of marrying a wealthy man who had told her he had no interest in "ready-made" family, the resulting revulsion by the general public helped sell newspapers and increase media ratings.

But when a mother murders her children, it's rare for the news media to react with such high-profile coverage. It's far more common for the press to do high-profile news stories on murdering fathers like Manuel Gehring, who in 2003 killed his children and buried them off an interstate in Ohio, or Mark Castillo, who in 2008 drowned his children in a Baltimore hotel room bathtub before attempting to take his own life.

TV shows and movies likewise hardly ever tell stories of abusive mothers or mothers who kill their children, leaving the viewing public with the misimpression that fathers are a far greater danger to their children than mothers. TV shows and movies are also far more likely to portray girls as victims of maltreatment than boys.

However data from the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (DHHS) tells a completely opposite story regarding who abuses children. The DHHS publishes an annual report called "Child Maltreatment", and each year's report contains a table detailing the parental status of the perpetrator(s).

The DHHS data shows that of children abused by one parent between 2001 and 2006, 70.6% were abused by their mothers, whereas only 29.4% were abused by their fathers.

And of children who died at the hands of one parent between 2001 and 2006, 70.8% were killed by their mothers, whereas only 29.2% were killed by their fathers.

Furthermore, contrary to media portrayals that leave the viewer with the impression that only girls are ever harmed, boys constituted fully 60% of child fatalities. (Table 4-3, p. 71, Child Maltreatment 2006, http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm06/cm06.pdf, reports that 675 boys died in 2006 as compared to 454 girls).

The pervasive media bias cannot help but influence judges. Thus the newspapers, TV shows, and movies that promote this bias must bear a significant part of the responsibility for child abuse and deaths of children at the hands of violent mothers.

1. STATISTICS: The killing of infants and newborns is one of the most common forms of murder by women. In industrialized countries, for every 100,000 infants, 2.4 to 7 are murdered. The true incidence is likely under-reported because the existence of some deceased babies is unknown until the bodies are discovered. Up to 10% of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) cases are actually undetected homicides. Most murdered infants and newborns are killed by the biological mother.2. DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS: Women who murder newborns tend to be younger than age 25, single, live with their parents, unemployed or attending school, do not seek prenatal care, and are no longer involved with the child’s father. Women who murder infants older than one day of age tend to be older than 25, are often married, well-educated, and commit the crime as a form of retaliation (e.g., against an abusive spouse).3. MENTAL ILLNESS: Many to most women who kill infants are not formally designated as mentally ill. Other factors associated with infanticide besides

RJ Sykes's avatar

‘’I’m asking you to start looking at the world stage for what it is: a performance.

We are constantly watching people play their assigned parts, narratives take shape in real time and millions of people suddenly become consumed by the exact same story at the exact same moment.’’

Spot on. It’s exactly this.

It’s great that many are already calling out this story. It’s the same psychological playbook every single time. The real issue lies with those who fail the test and fall for the continuous propaganda, over and over. They’re a hazard to the rest of us.

Ian Moore's avatar

The people are feed stories that removes their abilities to look at what is really happening. You are so perspective in seeing that these are TV soap drama's that now are 'real news' instead of seeing the real news and the decay of society.

e arthur's avatar

Rad… thanks for speaking up as you did - something is fishy all around with the LC circus.

That “Abacadabra” pic is astounding - haven't seen it before. Thanks.

I don't know if you've seen this piece but I hadn't considered the lawfare or money aspects of the whole thing either, I think it's a worthwhile piece along the lines of the perspective you laid out here.

https://substack.com/@morganc000/note/p-213965236?r=4c6jfe

Heather Boylen's avatar

What are you talking about black lives?

Chaplain Bob Walker's avatar

edgar bronfman was head of the world jewish congress

Ronin's avatar

Was 9/11 even real? Dan Fournier just made a reasonable case that our military may have projected a plane or planes hitting the towers with tech developed in the 90s

Mark's avatar

Maddie, God has given you a mind that questions and eyes to see. You are using those gifts to fire truth missiles day after day. Keep it up. The ones in control hate us. They want us all either dead or enslaved. That is without question. History shows us they are capable of unimaginable horror and far too many of us simply cannot fathom that level of evil, but it exists and is active in ALL institutions including the church. We are in a war and have been since Lucifer rebelled and was thrust out of heaven. Scripture tells us there are children of light and 'children of the wicked one', whose native tongue is lies. We are in a war and truth is their kryptonite. Sandy Hook, another bullshit psyop. Thank you Maddie. Keep up the good work.

Aaron - Modern-Day Mystic's avatar

The entire point, Maddie, is THAT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT IT!!!