Wow 😲 I had no idea about all those wicked symbols in these children's shows and movies. Thanks for putting this front and center. I really appreciate your hard work, Maddie!
Does anyone find it bizarre that Lindsey’s father…
He is consistently described as a school photographer associated with Lifetouch (or a Lifetouch subsidiary focused on student/church portraits).
The company that takes school photos for millions of kids across America is Lifetouch.
Lifetouch is owned by Shutterfly.
Shutterfly was acquired by Apollo Global Management.
Apollo was co-founded by Leon Black a billionaire financier who has been publicly reported in major news outlets regarding as connected to the Epstein files.
Now pause.
Every year our children are photographed at school.
Those images are uploaded to databases...
by a company whose owner is supposedly tied to the epstein files?
The round spirals are possibly imv related to the tunnels, also mentioned in the same blog post I linked above. When the eye sees concentric rings, and that's what an onrushing tunnel is made of, the perception often becomes a spiral even though the concentric rings aren't a single spiraling line, but rather, separate closed shapes. A visual experience of moving through a tunnel could become the visual experience of facing a spiral, or vice versa.
I can only speak for myself and what I have heard reported from others, but these primitive shapes, spirals included, commonly end up as doodles when one isn't drawing a narrative picture. Doodles often become angular spiraling forms too--triangles and squares--but these are still more conscious and deliberate shapes.
The primitive forms I'm talking about also comprise the building blocks of decorative art, and so in fact we see many examples of nesting forms in art throughout human history. For example, squared-off spirals are used as margin decorations in ancient pottery, on walls, on the hems of clothing, etc.
For a formally trained artist, which most textile designers are, the use of spiral patterns on clothing is an obvious formal choice to reach for. Using such a shape as the foundation of an all-over, jumbled "repeat" (the block of design which, stamped on a length of cloth, produces seamlessly repeating pattern) would be a phoned-in design choice, when "vibrant" is wanted, partly because spirals produce a feeling of motion in the eye, therefore in the mind.
With that said, the triangle pattern is *not* in my opinion just a primitive geometric form. It is simply not a mark that is produced by a simple, regular equation which produces a circular spiral with no flat edges / faces. There's nothing "subconscious" or "dreaming" about it, it has a quality of deliberation and awareness in fact.
The Greek Key is not as automatic as the spiral, but it has fractal and therefore infinite qualities, which once again the triangle does not. The two nested hearts are an even more complex and human-made pattern than the triangles. However, the infinitely repeating pattern of hearts fills the entire visual field, and so does have some quality of subconscious repetition with an inner and singular experience implied, not the two-consciousness experience of the nested design which shows two hearts then stops.
The more I think about the nested triangles logo, the more its design qualities, as showing a deliberate human alteration therefore deformation of the fundamental therefore essential spiral, strike me as acknowledging the perversion of the natural progression of sexuality inherent in the act, which is imposed from the outside inward. The design does proceed from the interior without conscious instruction as a rounded spiral does. A line that is used to draw a triangle needs human instruction to bend, proceed, then bend again, ad nausea. The path of the line used to create the circular spiral is so different from the triangles' path, I don't read the two forms as being all that similar or having similar meanings.
Whether the triangle design was created by someone who was conscious of all that, I don't know, but I am certain that these associations can't have escaped those who the triangle is *for*. These types aren't deficient in being able to use the poetic arts, they are just defective in what they say with those languages. That sort of depth of meaning, perverted though it is, would lead to the symbol having staying power.
Symbols that don't have staying power, stop being used or they are altered over time until some shapes are happened upon which do have strong meaning.
I cannot say for certain that the use of a round spiral does not occur downstream of a designer's intention to refer to the triangle , however the two really are not the same shape and don't come from the same creation process. If I were looking at a lot of possible places where spiral-like patterns occur, if the symbol I was examining were not exactly a nested triangle, I would be looking for other similarities or differences, either essential to the forms or that can be read as references, before I conclude that a round spiral means nested triangle.
Line quality would be the next point of comparison. I would expect to see a very close match between the lines' edges, thickness, degree of wobbliness vs clean uniformity, and so on.
Rhythm and duration of the parts of the design would be next. I would expect to see the exact number of loops around the center, with the start and end points in the same position. I wouldn't rank barely one, or more than 2, loops as very good matches.
I might also look for variations on the theme that keep the triangle but make other changes. Perhaps the single line would change to concentric shapes, perhaps with crossing elements like a "Q" tail instead of a spiral. In design, inversion (open to closed, outward to inward, positive to negative space, halfway hidden vs all visible) is a way to refer to the original idea, whereas vague similarity between designs with fundamental differences is at best only a partial reference, and then we need to see what sort of intention might have informed the design.
Context helps with understanding intention. It's a little disconcerting to see any spirals on boys' undershorts after looking at the triangle logi. I am not saying it isn't. It is however part of the design archives, that I believe quiksilver clothing used a wave form that is similar to the spiral on the shorts. Surfer and tribal clothing have had design crossover, through the years. I would need to have a lot more context for any fibers occurrences, because of all the cloth and clothing references going back centuries.
The Lion King patterning on face and hide, however, seems perhaps gratuitous and purposeless, to the point that the odd read or can't-read rather, acts like a "tell" for me. It doesn't read as "spots" nor quite as "tattoo" for me. To me all the examples look more like something that is supposed to look to a small child like a tribal tat, yet retain a reading as something different, yet it comes across obscurely or badly, which shouldn't happen in a professional design. Basically it feels off to me. I think you are correct in being suspicious.
Returning to the boys' shorts, in general, a point I would use to evaluate similar-but-not--perfect matches like the round spirals, or the infinite throb of hearts becoming a tunnel shape is this: is there another known design pattern or visual experience that these could be referring to? In the cases of round spirals, I think often yes. The specific infinity hearts example given, yes I think in this case it is likely to be referring to endless love or falling in love or exuberant love. And the Lion King fur/skin designs are referring to something, it seems too intentional for that to not be the case, yet it's totally unfamiliar to me. It is not like the quiksilver clothing; it might be like Australian dreamtime patterns but that would be deeply anachronistic and it doesn't feel like a good rendition in any case.
And then, to offer a strong cap that can be put on all of these, if the designer of a given item turns out to have a personal connection such as a criminal history, that of course adds a lot of weight to suspicious interpretations of all their symbolic language. Disney and Target are both, in that sense, suspicious corporations. However, I would still be expecting to see designs that are at least as odd and gratuitous as the cartoon fur "tattoos" or "spots", if that is where the designer's intentions were.
I have a personal professional notion that when it comes to visual communication , subtext comes through unconsciously, and is often right there on the surface--but also I have observed that what formally trained people think they are making is usually very different from how it's taken. In this, I think we could blame an intentional perversion of the academy. Possibly for much the same reasons as you are describing here.
All I have to say is wow what a extremely in depth commentary on design and it’s relationship to well.. life.
I just found it funny that you start off saying “I have just one thing……“ And you wrote a wonderful, intriguing, thought-provoking, and interesting article regarding the history and the context of these symbols’s representation. Now I hope I don’t offend but I really had never given it much thought, however it sounds very interesting!!! Thanks for sharing.
Thank you so much for your support. It means the world to me, truly! Would greatly appreciate if you could share my substack with some friends as I’m extremely shadow banned 🙏🏼
Hi Maddie, I see what you mean. And I’m sure you’re right about some things.
But perhaps these symbols, which have existed for a long time, have been misused by pedophiles, even if they weren’t invented by pedophiles.
And couldn’t it also be that, precisely because these patterns are so simple and many people aren’t aware of their pedophilic connotations, they’re simply being used innocently?
I've seen stuff like this before. What i wanna know is how these people know this is what they're showing and also y'all do realize that the average person and/or kid has no idea what any of those symbols mean even if it is true until they read or listen to articles like this.. think about it.
Uh huh how do you know that and how's the fbi know and why would they release it and why would anyone trust the fbi? What it comes down to is a psychological trick of spell casting. The only reason you know what you know is because they want you to know it.
I just read it, obviously. No one is more importantly disillusioned by the FBI than me. I grew up in the FBI and my senior Special Agent father died in the line of duty June 21, 1979. You are absurdly presumptous.
The top tiers of the Bureau are 100% guily of covering up the absolute worst corruption on the planet including the latest headlined Epstein cases! And it goes far beyond the Panama Papers and what most percrive elsewhere, because they have given impunity to dark ops, military actions commanded by presidents( lies about Intelligence ), and the most vile corporate interests and the ties to other crime syndicates. What is headlined is for pride. We are actually in the middle of clandestine 5th gen warfare. That means neuro/bioweapons, AI exploiting all vulnerabilities to design and implement destructive chaos, psychopathic predations, and disconnection with a tightening panopticon of gellish proportions!
That said, the rank and file enter the FBI( at least before Trump/Patel/Bondi recruits, to go after all predators and without scope they trust their supervisors and the Director. They are all compartmentalized by need to know.
Well if asking questions makes me presumptuous then I guess I did. You brought it up and I asked the necessary questions I felt that pertains to the truth. I'm well aware of how they operate and what organizations they answer to. They all operate the same way and by the same hierarchy standards.
Are you out of your mind? Most of these are just spirals or hearts! You do realize that artmakers use "shapes" as geometric embellishment, and that you are reading into basic use of these?
That said, you cited a couple of micro-release kids' movies that more arguably could be intentional use of these symbols. But that is not "the elites don't want you to know," it's "this tinyass pedo animator got away with putting their pedo symbol in a movie."
Let's not imagine things that aren't there, for pete's sake.
According to a Guardian investigation, the Israeli government funded a fake American think tank called the Hanover Institute, which proceeded to manufacture more than 560,000 words of pseudo-academic material in nine days. One million dollars or thereabouts bought a digital sausage factory of respectable-looking reports explaining why Israel's critics were wrong, why the evidence was complicated, why the accusations were questionable and why, when all was said and done, perhaps nobody should be too hasty about calling anything genocide.
But here's the beautiful part. The intended audience wasn't necessarily you. It was the machine sitting between you and the internet.
The operation appears to have been designed to flood the web with scholarly-looking rubbish, complete with citations, institutional language and carefully engineered headlines corresponding to the questions people actually ask AI. The strategy was breathtakingly modern: manufacture the evidence, optimise the propaganda, seed the internet, and let ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and their mechanical cousins vacuum it up and regurgitate it in the soothing voice of an impartial encyclopedia.
This is the future they promised us: artificial intelligence delivering objective knowledge. Except there is a small problem. Whoever controls the information swamp controls what the machine finds swimming in it.
The old propagandist stood on a balcony and shouted lies through a loudspeaker. The modern propagandist builds a fake university, hires some digital gunslingers, manufactures half a million words of respectable bullshit and waits patiently for the algorithms to turn it into context.
And then somebody asks the machine: "Is Israel committing genocide in Gaza?"
And the machine, having swallowed the internet, clears its electronic throat and says:
"It's complicated."
Jesus Fucking Christ.
They aren't merely trying to win the argument anymore. They're trying to manufacture the library in which the argument takes place.
These are important insights about organized predators signaling each other. I had no damn clue about those details. But I want to stress that we have been inside a whole other, far more sophisticated, free for all from the purveyors of clandestine 5th gen warfare. I do not see you coming to grips with the indiscriminate devastation of neuroweapons and the panopticon in the dark of illegal secrecy! Children are the most suseptible and defenseless! The majority of unwary population of usual, law abiding, and caring adults fair no better in the dark! It is far darker than one aspect, more powerful, exponentially more sophisticated and it's encompassing everyone and thing!
I pretty much knew about all of these and how prolific they are in Childrens movies and elsewhere.
Interestingly, Apricorn; a company that sells encrypted / secure hard drives uses the boy love logo as their main company logo. It's been modified slightly now. It used to be exactly the same as the boy love logo - https://apricorn.com/
Nope, not even trying. I think I first encountered Apricorn in 2008, and that was their logo back then. It's only since I've realized what it means. It makes perfect sense if you are secretly signalling to depraved, twisted, evil demons. Offering a place they can securely stash their sick material.
Wow 😲 I had no idea about all those wicked symbols in these children's shows and movies. Thanks for putting this front and center. I really appreciate your hard work, Maddie!
Thank you so much for your support, Scott! 🙏🏼 would greatly appreciate it if you could share this one with a friend. It’s such an important one!
https://x.com/babyd1111229/status/2096898167153332258
Don’t mind me, BUT I’ve got a question…
Does anyone find it bizarre that Lindsey’s father…
He is consistently described as a school photographer associated with Lifetouch (or a Lifetouch subsidiary focused on student/church portraits).
The company that takes school photos for millions of kids across America is Lifetouch.
Lifetouch is owned by Shutterfly.
Shutterfly was acquired by Apollo Global Management.
Apollo was co-founded by Leon Black a billionaire financier who has been publicly reported in major news outlets regarding as connected to the Epstein files.
Now pause.
Every year our children are photographed at school.
Those images are uploaded to databases...
by a company whose owner is supposedly tied to the epstein files?
Database of kids 🫣🤷🏻♀️
Had no idea they’re even worse symbols for these depraved crimes
As always, valuable work Maddie.
I want to mention one thing which in my view should trigger a deeper contextual analysis of the round spirals to see if they belong.
Round spirals (as distinct from angular spiral-like forms) are a primitive geometric shape, one of four categories of the shapes produced in the neural architecture of the eye, called "phosphenes". https://gettherapybirmingham.com/blog/the-geometric-mind-why-we-see-fractals-spirals-and-sacred-geometry-during-altered-states-of-consciousness/
The round spirals are possibly imv related to the tunnels, also mentioned in the same blog post I linked above. When the eye sees concentric rings, and that's what an onrushing tunnel is made of, the perception often becomes a spiral even though the concentric rings aren't a single spiraling line, but rather, separate closed shapes. A visual experience of moving through a tunnel could become the visual experience of facing a spiral, or vice versa.
I can only speak for myself and what I have heard reported from others, but these primitive shapes, spirals included, commonly end up as doodles when one isn't drawing a narrative picture. Doodles often become angular spiraling forms too--triangles and squares--but these are still more conscious and deliberate shapes.
The primitive forms I'm talking about also comprise the building blocks of decorative art, and so in fact we see many examples of nesting forms in art throughout human history. For example, squared-off spirals are used as margin decorations in ancient pottery, on walls, on the hems of clothing, etc.
For a formally trained artist, which most textile designers are, the use of spiral patterns on clothing is an obvious formal choice to reach for. Using such a shape as the foundation of an all-over, jumbled "repeat" (the block of design which, stamped on a length of cloth, produces seamlessly repeating pattern) would be a phoned-in design choice, when "vibrant" is wanted, partly because spirals produce a feeling of motion in the eye, therefore in the mind.
Such a full width design would also "play with" the visual conventions of the "Greek Key" or meander, which is a lot more restrained. https://www.theartnewbie.com/blog/greece/greek-key-pattern
With that said, the triangle pattern is *not* in my opinion just a primitive geometric form. It is simply not a mark that is produced by a simple, regular equation which produces a circular spiral with no flat edges / faces. There's nothing "subconscious" or "dreaming" about it, it has a quality of deliberation and awareness in fact.
The Greek Key is not as automatic as the spiral, but it has fractal and therefore infinite qualities, which once again the triangle does not. The two nested hearts are an even more complex and human-made pattern than the triangles. However, the infinitely repeating pattern of hearts fills the entire visual field, and so does have some quality of subconscious repetition with an inner and singular experience implied, not the two-consciousness experience of the nested design which shows two hearts then stops.
The more I think about the nested triangles logo, the more its design qualities, as showing a deliberate human alteration therefore deformation of the fundamental therefore essential spiral, strike me as acknowledging the perversion of the natural progression of sexuality inherent in the act, which is imposed from the outside inward. The design does proceed from the interior without conscious instruction as a rounded spiral does. A line that is used to draw a triangle needs human instruction to bend, proceed, then bend again, ad nausea. The path of the line used to create the circular spiral is so different from the triangles' path, I don't read the two forms as being all that similar or having similar meanings.
Whether the triangle design was created by someone who was conscious of all that, I don't know, but I am certain that these associations can't have escaped those who the triangle is *for*. These types aren't deficient in being able to use the poetic arts, they are just defective in what they say with those languages. That sort of depth of meaning, perverted though it is, would lead to the symbol having staying power.
Symbols that don't have staying power, stop being used or they are altered over time until some shapes are happened upon which do have strong meaning.
I cannot say for certain that the use of a round spiral does not occur downstream of a designer's intention to refer to the triangle , however the two really are not the same shape and don't come from the same creation process. If I were looking at a lot of possible places where spiral-like patterns occur, if the symbol I was examining were not exactly a nested triangle, I would be looking for other similarities or differences, either essential to the forms or that can be read as references, before I conclude that a round spiral means nested triangle.
Line quality would be the next point of comparison. I would expect to see a very close match between the lines' edges, thickness, degree of wobbliness vs clean uniformity, and so on.
Rhythm and duration of the parts of the design would be next. I would expect to see the exact number of loops around the center, with the start and end points in the same position. I wouldn't rank barely one, or more than 2, loops as very good matches.
I might also look for variations on the theme that keep the triangle but make other changes. Perhaps the single line would change to concentric shapes, perhaps with crossing elements like a "Q" tail instead of a spiral. In design, inversion (open to closed, outward to inward, positive to negative space, halfway hidden vs all visible) is a way to refer to the original idea, whereas vague similarity between designs with fundamental differences is at best only a partial reference, and then we need to see what sort of intention might have informed the design.
Context helps with understanding intention. It's a little disconcerting to see any spirals on boys' undershorts after looking at the triangle logi. I am not saying it isn't. It is however part of the design archives, that I believe quiksilver clothing used a wave form that is similar to the spiral on the shorts. Surfer and tribal clothing have had design crossover, through the years. I would need to have a lot more context for any fibers occurrences, because of all the cloth and clothing references going back centuries.
The Lion King patterning on face and hide, however, seems perhaps gratuitous and purposeless, to the point that the odd read or can't-read rather, acts like a "tell" for me. It doesn't read as "spots" nor quite as "tattoo" for me. To me all the examples look more like something that is supposed to look to a small child like a tribal tat, yet retain a reading as something different, yet it comes across obscurely or badly, which shouldn't happen in a professional design. Basically it feels off to me. I think you are correct in being suspicious.
Returning to the boys' shorts, in general, a point I would use to evaluate similar-but-not--perfect matches like the round spirals, or the infinite throb of hearts becoming a tunnel shape is this: is there another known design pattern or visual experience that these could be referring to? In the cases of round spirals, I think often yes. The specific infinity hearts example given, yes I think in this case it is likely to be referring to endless love or falling in love or exuberant love. And the Lion King fur/skin designs are referring to something, it seems too intentional for that to not be the case, yet it's totally unfamiliar to me. It is not like the quiksilver clothing; it might be like Australian dreamtime patterns but that would be deeply anachronistic and it doesn't feel like a good rendition in any case.
And then, to offer a strong cap that can be put on all of these, if the designer of a given item turns out to have a personal connection such as a criminal history, that of course adds a lot of weight to suspicious interpretations of all their symbolic language. Disney and Target are both, in that sense, suspicious corporations. However, I would still be expecting to see designs that are at least as odd and gratuitous as the cartoon fur "tattoos" or "spots", if that is where the designer's intentions were.
I have a personal professional notion that when it comes to visual communication , subtext comes through unconsciously, and is often right there on the surface--but also I have observed that what formally trained people think they are making is usually very different from how it's taken. In this, I think we could blame an intentional perversion of the academy. Possibly for much the same reasons as you are describing here.
All I have to say is wow what a extremely in depth commentary on design and it’s relationship to well.. life.
I just found it funny that you start off saying “I have just one thing……“ And you wrote a wonderful, intriguing, thought-provoking, and interesting article regarding the history and the context of these symbols’s representation. Now I hope I don’t offend but I really had never given it much thought, however it sounds very interesting!!! Thanks for sharing.
Yes I will! And I think everything you are writing about is important!
Mahalo Maddie! The Smurfs were named after Demons….
The wizard is a zionist man in black, his cat is named Azrael.
HINT HINT.
I think there was a Gonzabel dude? Was my kids era……but them smurfs looked so innocent didn’t they?
In different countries they use sometimes use different names. Its the same one.
This cartoon may actually be there to make people aware.
These Belgian cartoonists art is like journalism.
Mind blowing Maddie! Appreciate your work. Keep it up! This needs to stop.
It’s because of all the things you are revealing that I started following you on Instagram, too. You’re a mind opener.
Thank you so much for your support. It means the world to me, truly! Would greatly appreciate if you could share my substack with some friends as I’m extremely shadow banned 🙏🏼
I do forward your Substacks.
Hi Maddie, I see what you mean. And I’m sure you’re right about some things.
But perhaps these symbols, which have existed for a long time, have been misused by pedophiles, even if they weren’t invented by pedophiles.
And couldn’t it also be that, precisely because these patterns are so simple and many people aren’t aware of their pedophilic connotations, they’re simply being used innocently?
Richard Kerr
Kincora orphanage trafficked with M15 and Roy Cohn
https://www.spreaker.com/episode/richard-kerr-sex-trafficked-by-roy-cohn--41129991
Lord Montbatten
Kincora orphanage trafficked with M15 and Roy Cohn
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/19MXYAnxps/
Edward Heath British P.M. yacht Morning Cloud rapes children
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/oct/05/ted-heath-would-have-been-questioned-under-caution-over-sex-assault-allegations
Today I was visiting someone, their kids were viewing RIO a pixar movie.
Packed with SM-ish talk. .. mum and dad happened to find it kinda funny.
... liberal corporate people who talk democratic but behave like gold collectors.
I may be losing a few friends if they read this. Tho... I hope they read it and start to think without cancelling me.
Not bad people, just a bit blind for certain things.
I've seen stuff like this before. What i wanna know is how these people know this is what they're showing and also y'all do realize that the average person and/or kid has no idea what any of those symbols mean even if it is true until they read or listen to articles like this.. think about it.
Yes, for sure. These symbols are evidently between predators. That is why the FBI refers to it as secret code.
Uh huh how do you know that and how's the fbi know and why would they release it and why would anyone trust the fbi? What it comes down to is a psychological trick of spell casting. The only reason you know what you know is because they want you to know it.
I just read it, obviously. No one is more importantly disillusioned by the FBI than me. I grew up in the FBI and my senior Special Agent father died in the line of duty June 21, 1979. You are absurdly presumptous.
The top tiers of the Bureau are 100% guily of covering up the absolute worst corruption on the planet including the latest headlined Epstein cases! And it goes far beyond the Panama Papers and what most percrive elsewhere, because they have given impunity to dark ops, military actions commanded by presidents( lies about Intelligence ), and the most vile corporate interests and the ties to other crime syndicates. What is headlined is for pride. We are actually in the middle of clandestine 5th gen warfare. That means neuro/bioweapons, AI exploiting all vulnerabilities to design and implement destructive chaos, psychopathic predations, and disconnection with a tightening panopticon of gellish proportions!
That said, the rank and file enter the FBI( at least before Trump/Patel/Bondi recruits, to go after all predators and without scope they trust their supervisors and the Director. They are all compartmentalized by need to know.
Well if asking questions makes me presumptuous then I guess I did. You brought it up and I asked the necessary questions I felt that pertains to the truth. I'm well aware of how they operate and what organizations they answer to. They all operate the same way and by the same hierarchy standards.
Are you out of your mind? Most of these are just spirals or hearts! You do realize that artmakers use "shapes" as geometric embellishment, and that you are reading into basic use of these?
That said, you cited a couple of micro-release kids' movies that more arguably could be intentional use of these symbols. But that is not "the elites don't want you to know," it's "this tinyass pedo animator got away with putting their pedo symbol in a movie."
Let's not imagine things that aren't there, for pete's sake.
PROPAGANDA FOR THE MACHINES
Welcome to Propaganda 2.0: Fuck with the bots.
According to a Guardian investigation, the Israeli government funded a fake American think tank called the Hanover Institute, which proceeded to manufacture more than 560,000 words of pseudo-academic material in nine days. One million dollars or thereabouts bought a digital sausage factory of respectable-looking reports explaining why Israel's critics were wrong, why the evidence was complicated, why the accusations were questionable and why, when all was said and done, perhaps nobody should be too hasty about calling anything genocide.
But here's the beautiful part. The intended audience wasn't necessarily you. It was the machine sitting between you and the internet.
The operation appears to have been designed to flood the web with scholarly-looking rubbish, complete with citations, institutional language and carefully engineered headlines corresponding to the questions people actually ask AI. The strategy was breathtakingly modern: manufacture the evidence, optimise the propaganda, seed the internet, and let ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and their mechanical cousins vacuum it up and regurgitate it in the soothing voice of an impartial encyclopedia.
This is the future they promised us: artificial intelligence delivering objective knowledge. Except there is a small problem. Whoever controls the information swamp controls what the machine finds swimming in it.
The old propagandist stood on a balcony and shouted lies through a loudspeaker. The modern propagandist builds a fake university, hires some digital gunslingers, manufactures half a million words of respectable bullshit and waits patiently for the algorithms to turn it into context.
And then somebody asks the machine: "Is Israel committing genocide in Gaza?"
And the machine, having swallowed the internet, clears its electronic throat and says:
"It's complicated."
Jesus Fucking Christ.
They aren't merely trying to win the argument anymore. They're trying to manufacture the library in which the argument takes place.
https://cparrino.substack.com/p/de-zionising-ai-how-israel-is-trying
100%!!
The double spiral is ancient and symbolic of the way time moves in starfields
These are important insights about organized predators signaling each other. I had no damn clue about those details. But I want to stress that we have been inside a whole other, far more sophisticated, free for all from the purveyors of clandestine 5th gen warfare. I do not see you coming to grips with the indiscriminate devastation of neuroweapons and the panopticon in the dark of illegal secrecy! Children are the most suseptible and defenseless! The majority of unwary population of usual, law abiding, and caring adults fair no better in the dark! It is far darker than one aspect, more powerful, exponentially more sophisticated and it's encompassing everyone and thing!
I pretty much knew about all of these and how prolific they are in Childrens movies and elsewhere.
Interestingly, Apricorn; a company that sells encrypted / secure hard drives uses the boy love logo as their main company logo. It's been modified slightly now. It used to be exactly the same as the boy love logo - https://apricorn.com/
Just followed your link— it’s horrific that they’re just not hiding it anymore
Nope, not even trying. I think I first encountered Apricorn in 2008, and that was their logo back then. It's only since I've realized what it means. It makes perfect sense if you are secretly signalling to depraved, twisted, evil demons. Offering a place they can securely stash their sick material.