18 Comments
User's avatar
Mark's avatar

Why do we keep paying taxes for all these atrocities.

denise ward's avatar

They might as well, Americans are not going to do anything about it. That's the message we've given these fukkers.

Sandra Greer's avatar

Al Jazeera is not a reliable source.

Books Behind Borders's avatar

I’m curious, what’s a reliable source? Because it’s certainly not the mainstream media. I reviewed their reporting. It certainly seemed reliable to me.

Nonwo's avatar

Don’t bother with Hasbara. Anyone that questions these atrocities are suspect when the whole earth knows their atrocities.

Sandra Greer's avatar

It is useless replying to anyone who uses the term "Hasbara".

Nonwo's avatar

I agreed with you! Al Jazeera is not reliable. What more do you want from me?

Books Behind Borders's avatar

Why are they not reliable? In your eyes, who is reliable?

Nonwo's avatar

You didn’t get my sarcasm. I said Al Azeera undercounts the figures, the amounts of devastation. When they were first created they were 100% on target. About 4 years ago the word was they were apologists for Israel meaning they reported Israel’s casualty figures as facts. They were criticized for that reason. Perhaps they came back around again. It’s worth researching.

Books Behind Borders's avatar

Did you watch the video?

Sandra Greer's avatar

I don't see a video.

Lulu's avatar

It's linked below the Miriam Adelson article links. Here you go:

https://youtu.be/GXkfo_ImlUk?si=AmhTvY0ZL4Gf6WQA

Nonwo's avatar

I agree. They underestimate Israel’s atrocities immensely. They have been criticized for that, even called “Israeli agents.” We must 10 fold the number to get the true figure.

Sandra Greer's avatar

That is just the usual dubious evidence - 10 times less reliable than Al Jazeera, of course.

Nonwo's avatar

Yes Hasbara keep making those shekels.