Most Americans know the story of Jonestown, or at least they think they do.

The story we were handed was simple enough: Jim Jones started out as a humanitarian, eventually went insane and became a charismatic cult leader who convinced hundreds of vulnerable people to follow him into the Guyanese jungle in South America. Congressman Leo Ryan was murdered while investigating the settlement and more than 913 people ultimately died after drinking cyanide-laced Flavor Aid, either killing themselves or allowing themselves to be killed because of their devotion to Jones.

That is the story most of us grew up hearing. Jonestown became synonymous with blind obedience to a cult leader, to the point that “drinking the Kool-Aid” became part of the American vocabulary.

But that version leaves out some of the strangest parts of what actually happened in Guyana, including one question that has followed this story for decades:

Was Jonestown simply the work of one insane cult leader or is there more to the story involving the CIA and the U.S. government's very real history of experimenting with mind control?

Because when you actually start going back through what was reported about the Peoples Temple, what authorities knew before the deaths, what happened in the days immediately afterward, and what investigators actually discovered inside Jonestown, there are holes in that story big enough to drive truck through.

Let’s Get Into It…

On December 29, 1978, 41 days after the mass deaths at Jonestown, The New York Times published a story under the headline, “Jones Commune Found Stocked With Drugs to Control the Mind.”

Investigators found a massive supply of psychoactive drugs at Jonestown, including 11,000 doses of Thorazine, along with enormous quantities of Quaaludes, Valium, Demerol and other mind controlling substances.

And immediately, I have questions. Questions that, apparently, nobody at The New York Times seemed particularly interested in asking. Shocker.

• Why did it take nearly six weeks for this “discovery” to make its way into the press? When, exactly, were these drugs first discovered?

• Do they truly expect us to believe it’s possible to obtain and smuggle this quantity of controlled drugs without the active help of pharmaceutical companies, organized crime, law enforcement, the State Department, or some combination of them?

• And most importantly, what in the world were they doing with all of these drugs down there?

And then there was Jonestown’s medical operation.

Jonestown boasted about having an incredibly modern and efficient healthcare system, supposedly built around the humanitarian mission of “serving the people.” They had laboratories, modern testing and diagnostic equipment, nurses, doctors, therapists, dietitians, and many residents were reportedly receiving daily medical checkups. This was the kind of medical setup that would have put plenty of community clinics back in the United States to shame.

But here’s where things get strange.

For a community with such an elaborate medical operation, where are the medical records?

We’re told those records either disappeared or never existed in the first place. How does that happen? You have doctors, nurses, laboratories, diagnostic equipment, daily examinations and enormous quantities of prescription drugs, but somehow the records documenting the medical treatment of the people living there are nowhere to be found?

And then you have to somehow reconcile all of this supposed “humanitarianism” with what we now know was happening inside Jonestown. People were being controlled, drugged and subjected to conditions that amounted to virtual slavery.

Once you start looking past the version of Jonestown that has been repeated for nearly 50 years, it becomes pretty clear there was a lot more going on down there than Jim Jones simply losing his mind.

So let’s go back through the story the media gave us about Jonestown and the deaths of 913 people…

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

The Official Version of Events

According to the version we were given, the Peoples Temple was led by good people doing good things. Apparently they were so humanitarian that, for years, law enforcement, the FBI, the State Department, the Treasury Department, the San Francisco Chronicle and others repeatedly looked the other way as reports and allegations piled up involving kidnapping, murder, smuggling, extortion, child abuse and theft.

And somehow, while all of this humanitarianism was going on, the Peoples Temple managed to smuggle $15 million in cash out of the country, along with a massive cache of weapons and explosives and tens of thousands of doses of controlled pharmaceuticals, right under the noses of American authorities.

Not to mention that some of the earliest settlers at Jonestown had even been virtually kidnapped from the United States.

The authorities were apparently so impressed with Jones’ humanitarianism that they repeatedly ignored reports of crimes and failed to investigate serious allegations of criminal activity and smuggling involving the Peoples Temple in both the United States and Guyana.

Then, when Congressman Leo Ryan requested information from the State Department because he wanted to travel to Guyana and investigate Jonestown himself, suddenly there was supposedly no information available about the group.

We are talking about the United States government. The same government that can track your income, your passport, your criminal record and practically every interaction you’ve ever had with it, but when a sitting congressman asked what they knew about Jim Jones and hundreds of Americans living in a compound in Guyana, suddenly nobody seemed to know a damn thing.

And it wasn’t because nobody had warned them.

It is now known that the San Francisco police and media, repeatedly declined to investigate reported crimes by the People’s Temple, and that the State Dept., FBI and other government agencies had also, over the years, received complaints and reports of kidnapping, torture, smuggling and so on which they declined to investigate.

Apparently Jim Jones was just such a humanitarian that the police and FBI couldn’t bring themselves to believe any of it.

I have to admit, I never realized the U.S. government, the largest terrorist organization in the world, was so easily moved by humanitarianism.

Or maybe there was another reason the Peoples Temple was allowed to operate with so little scrutiny.

Jones certainly wasn’t without friends in powerful places. In San Francisco, he had the support of Mayor George Moscone. Yes, that Mayor George Moscone. The one who was murdered just nine days after Jonestown.

Police and the media quickly concluded Moscone’s murder had nothing to do with Jonestown, despite the fact that warnings had already been made that political officials could be killed.

Maybe Moscone’s murder had absolutely nothing to do with Jonestown. But considering everything that had just happened in Guyana, you would think somebody might have wanted to take a closer look.

Now Let’s Talk About The Congressman’s Visit

Despite the State Department supposedly knowing next to nothing about the Peoples Temple and despite opposition from embassy officials in Guyana, Congressman Ryan went ahead with the investigation anyway.

Tell me: does the following story, presented to us over and over again by the media, actually make sense?

After spending two days investigating Jonestown, Ryan and four others were slaughtered at the Port Kaituma airstrip on November 18.

But the descriptions of the men who carried out the attack are disturbing.

Witnesses described the assassins as “glassy-eyed,” “mechanically-walking zombies” who appeared completely “devoid of any emotion.”

So who exactly were these men?

Besides the 913 people reported dead, another 167 survivors eventually returned from Jonestown. Yet reports placed the population of the settlement at no fewer than 1,100 people, with many estimates closer to 1,200.

That leaves a pretty obvious question: what happened to the 200 or more people who were apparently never accounted for?

Survivors described a separate, all-white group inside Jonestown that was heavily armed, received better treatment than everyone else, and was reportedly free to come and go from the compound.

Who were they?

These armed guards were never accounted for in subsequent news reports.

Back to the shooting: Guyanese soldiers stationed nearby refused to get involved and no help arrived until the following morning. Why? Because there were no lights at the airstrip.

So let me make sure I understand this correctly. A high-level U.S. delegation, including a sitting United States Congressman and an official from the U.S. Embassy, are mowed down at an airstrip. People are dead, others are wounded, and nobody is coming to help them because there are no lights?

I thought helicopters had lights, but perhaps I’m mistaken.

Anyways, moving on…
The morning of November 19, help finally arrives and the survivors from Congressman Ryan’s group are evacuated. But then another 24 hours pass before it occurs to anyone that maybe they should go check Jonestown, the colony Ryan had just been investigating when he was murdered.

The compound was roughly an hour away by jeep or just a few minutes by helicopter.

When they finally get there, they discover the bodies.

Already decomposing.

Remarkable.

Once again, let’s think about what we’re actually being asked to believe here.

Presumably, the soldiers at the airstrip radioed in that Congressman Ryan’s group had just been massacred, that some of them were still alive, their lives were in danger and they desperately needed medical assistance.

Did the Guyanese police and military simply decide it was too dark outside and they would deal with it in the morning? Did anyone bother reporting to the U.S. Embassy that a sitting American Congressman had just been murdered and members of his delegation were still lying wounded at an airstrip?

And let’s remember who else we’re talking about here. The U.S. military is capable of moving an entire army practically anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice, but somehow it took 36 hours before anyone arrived at Jonestown to “discover” the bodies.

And somehow, this story is about to get even harder to believe.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

What They Found At Jonestown

On November 20, authorities reported finding 409 bodies at Jonestown. Another 500 people were reportedly missing, believed to be alive and to have escaped into the jungle.

So for the next three days, more than 250 U.S. Air Force personnel, along with other military and intelligence investigators and Guyanese military personnel, searched the jungle for these 500 missing people.

Journalists, with the exception of a select few, were forbidden from entering the scene.

Then something remarkable happened. It turns out, there wasn’t anybody in the jungle after all.

4 days after the initial count of 409 dead, the officer in charge announced that the body count “could reach 780.”

The following day, November 25, the final count suddenly jumped to more than 900 deceased.

So how exactly do we explain a mystery such as this?

We were told the original number (409) was simply a miscount. We were told the Guyanese couldn’t count properly. We were told there were bodies underneath other bodies.

Apparently, 500 bodies underneath the 400 they had already counted.

Okay, but what exactly are we supposed to believe here?

That hundreds of military, police and intelligence personnel spent three days searching the Guyanese jungle for roughly 500 people they believed were still alive only to eventually discover that the people they had been searching for were dead and lying right there at their feet the entire time?

And then, after finally discovering those 500 additional deceased bodies, it somehow took another 24 hours to count them all?

Keep that in mind, because we’re not done yet.

When reporters were finally allowed onto the scene, they started asking some pretty obvious questions about the deaths.

For one, why was there so much blood?

The explanation was that cyanide poisoning can apparently be a very bloody affair.

Really? I didn’t know that.

But despite all of the unanswered questions surrounding how these people actually died and what had happened at Jonestown, the U.S. Air Force rushed in once all of the bodies had finally been “discovered,” embalmed them and removed them from the scene.

In doing so, the Air Force effectively prevented a proper investigation of the scene, along with the autopsies and toxicological testing that could have helped determine exactly how these people died.

And when an Air Force spokesperson was asked why they did this, his response was incredible:

“I don’t know.”

Then, in an action described as unprecedented in police science, Jim Jones’ body was cremated while the entire world was still left wondering how he had actually died.

And throughout all of this, the media just kept repeating the same story: more than 900 people had committed mass suicide at Jonestown.

Never mind that neither the U.S. nor Guyanese military and police seemed particularly interested in conducting a serious investigation into how these people actually died. Never mind all the questions that piled up around the scene and the circumstances surrounding the deaths. The story had already been decided and the Mockingbird journalists happily repeated it.

For an event this massive, involving the deaths of more than 900 people under circumstances this bizarre, the complete lack of serious investigative journalism surrounding Jonestown is almost as unbelievable as the story itself.

The implications of all of this are staggering.

When you put it together, it starts to look like we could be dealing with a much larger cover-up involving the military, the State Department and the media, carried out so completely that almost nobody stopped to question just how many pieces of this story didn’t add up.

Even the deaths themselves could have been part of the cover-up. Were the roughly 900 deaths by suicides at all? Did they occur at the same time or over the course of several days?

Let’s dive a little deeper…

The Cause of Death: Suicide?

More than 900 men, women and children were suddenly and violently dead under circumstances that remain mind-boggling to this day.

And yet the explanation that quickly emerged in newspapers and books was incredibly simple: the people of Jonestown had been brainwashed. They were religious fanatics who had become so completely devoted to Jim Jones that when he told them to die, they obeyed.

So Jonestown became the image of just how powerful “brainwashing” could supposedly be, while also serving as a warning to the American public about the dangers of new religious movements.

In reality, what was presented as news was only a theory and, as it turned out, an inaccurate one.

The source of the “Kool-Aid Suicide” stories was the U.S. State Department, which presented the story immediately after the “suicides” were reported as though it was the only obvious truth. A U.S. Army spokesman pronounced with complete authority:

No autopsies are needed. The cause of death is not an issue here.

The bodies were then allowed to rot in the jungle. Despite the lack of a need for autopsies, Dr. C. Leslie Mootoo, the top Guyanese pathologist, was at Jonestown hours after the deaths, and, refused the assistance of U.S. pathologists who were attempting to engage in a cover-up.

His conclusions? Dr. Mootoo found fresh needle marks at the back of the left shoulder blades on 80 to 90 percent of the victims. This would indicate that people were held down and given a substance which killed them.

Others had been shot or strangled (you simply cannot strangle yourself).

A surviving witness stated that those who resisted were forced by armed guards to comply (the same assassins who killed Congressman Ryan, perhaps?)

Dr. Mootoo’s opinion, and that of the Guyanese grand jury investigating Jonestown, was that all but three (only two of which were suicides) were murdered by “persons unknown.”

Jim Jones himself was found to have been killed by a gunshot wound to the head.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

The Connections

Let’s take a closer look into Jim Jones’ own background.

Jones had told some of his neighbors that he was involved in the U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence. While living abroad, he also reportedly received an unusual amount of assistance from the U.S. Embassy, including transportation, groceries and a large home. One neighbor remembered that Jones “lived like a rich man.”

Then, shortly after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Jones returned to the United States with $10,000.

By 1965, he had established Peoples Temple in Ukiah, California, along with the Happy Havens Rest Home. Despite lacking properly trained personnel and appropriate licensing, Jones began surrounding himself with exactly the kinds of vulnerable people who would be easily swayed by a charismatic leader: prisoners, elderly people, patients from mental institutions and roughly 150 foster children, many of whom were placed there by court order.

But take a look at some of the other people who began appearing around Jones.

He had contact with missionaries from World Vision, an international evangelical order that often fronts for the CIA, along with the local head of the John Birch Society and Republican Party leaders.

Members of the Peoples Temple were reportedly used for voter organizing and fundraising connected to Richard Nixon’s 1968 presidential campaign. One of Jones’ advisers was also described as a mercenary connected to UNITA, the CIA-backed army in Angola.

Then there was the Layton family.

UC Berkeley chemist Dr. Laurence Laird Layton had worked on the Manhattan Project and later served as chief of the Army’s Chemical Warfare Division in the early 1950s. His wife was the daughter of Hugo Phillips, a German banker and stockbroker who became wealthy representing Siemens & Halske and I.G. Farben (two notorious Nazi Holocaust profiteers).

So Jones had claimed a connection to Naval Intelligence, received assistance from the U.S. Embassy, surrounded himself with vulnerable populations and had people entering his orbit with backgrounds touching the military, chemical warfare and CIA-backed operations.

Despite this background, he suddenly began presenting himself as a liberal socialist and eventually claimed to be the reincarnation of both Jesus Christ and Lenin. By this point, suspicion was already beginning to grow around the Peoples Temple, where Jones maintained armed security personnel dressed in black uniforms.

Jones took everything he could get from his followers, much of it coming directly from their welfare and Social Security checks, while accusations of blackmail, extortion and other forms of coercion followed the Peoples Temple.

The local press reported on seven mysterious deaths involving people who had attempted to leave the “church” or had come into conflict with Jones. At the same time, accusations of kidnapping, beatings and sexual abuse were beginning to circulate.

With the controversy growing around him, Jones moved to San Francisco.

And somehow, instead of all these allegations destroying his reputation, Jones became an important fundraiser for the Bay Area political establishment. Before long, he was rubbing shoulders with some of the biggest names among the liberal and radical elite, meeting people like Rosalynn Carter (wife of former president Jimmy Carter) and Angela Davis (a prominent political activist).

Jones was eventually rewarded with a position on the city’s Housing Commission, while some of his key followers landed jobs in the Welfare Department.

Much of Jones’ following came from the unemployed and dispossessed. The Temple deliberately recruited among the poor and vulnerable, particularly women, children and minorities.

Many members were recruited directly from San Francisco mental hospitals (keep this in mind as you continue to read this).

In 1977, an exposé put him on the defensive and Jones responded by moving his supposed utopia to Guyana.

Once again, he did so with assistance from the U.S. Embassy.

More Connections…

And then there is Richard Dwyer, the U.S. Embassy official who traveled to Jonestown with Congressman Ryan.

As the deaths were unfolding, Jones can be heard on the infamous tape yelling, “Get Dwyer out of here!”

Dwyer was later found at the airstrip, methodically washing his hands.

In 1968, Dwyer’s name appeared in a publication called Who’s Who in the CIA. When he was later asked directly whether the allegation that he worked for the CIA was true, his response was:

No comment.

And Dwyer wasn’t the only person in Guyana with CIA connections.

Besides those previously mentioned, U.S. Ambassador John Burke and embassy official Richard McCoy were also reported to have suspicious ties to the intelligence community.

McCoy, while he was serving as the U.S. Consul and Deputy Chief of Mission at the American Embassy in Georgetown, was the primary liaison between the U.S. government and the cult.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Embassy in Georgetown housed the CIA station operating in Guyana.

At the time, Guyana had a socialist government, making the country an obvious potential target for American covert operations.

Then there was Dan Webber, who was sent to Guyana after the massacre, and he was also with the CIA.

Even Joseph Blatchford, who became the “official” attorney for the Jonestown survivors had previously been caught up in a controversy involving allegations of CIA infiltration of the Peace Corps.

And then we have the money.

Millions of dollars belonging to the Peoples Temple simply “disappeared” after the slaughter. Conservative estimates put the missing fortune at around $26 million, while some estimates went as high as $2 billion.

Where the hell did all of that money go? And where did it come from in the first place?

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Suspicious Deaths After The Massacre

The killings didn't stop in Guyana.

Michael Prokes was one of Jim Jones’ aides. After Jonestown, Prokes held a press conference where he claimed that the CIA and FBI were withholding an audiotape of the massacre.

During that same press conference, he also revealed that he had been an FBI informant.

Immediately afterward, Prokes walked into the restroom.

He did not come out alive.

His death was ruled, as always, a suicide.

And the strange deaths didn’t end there. In Georgetown, several more Peoples Temple members were killed following the massacre at Jonestown.

The man charged with those murders was Charles Beikman, an early follower of Jones who had eventually become one of his “adopted sons.”

Beikman also happened to be a Green Beret.

Then there were Jeanne and Al Mills, former the Peoples Temple members who were writing a book about Jonestown. Both were found bound and shot to death inside their home.

In Detroit, another Jonestown survivor was killed near his home. And yet another survivor would later become involved in a mass murder of schoolchildren in Los Angeles.

But perhaps one of the strangest questions concerns Jim Jones himself.

There were questions about whether the body identified as Jones was actually his. Photographs of the body did not show tattoos Jones was known to have, his fingerprints had to be checked twice, and his dental records were never used to confirm the identification.

Jones was also known to use body doubles, similar to how the CIA has been known to operate.

Let’s Recap Before We Talk More About Drugs and CIA Mind Control

As we’ve already discussed, Jones had a pattern of recruiting his followers from some of the most vulnerable populations in society, including prisoners, people from mental institutions, minorities and others who were already marginalized or dependent on institutions.

Now ask yourself: who else was notorious for targeting these exact same populations for experimentation?

The CIA.

And around the same time Jones was building his following, cults were exploding in popularity across the United States and around the world.

Could Jonestown itself have been connected to, or even created by, the CIA?

Before we can seriously explore that possibility, we need to understand exactly what the CIA had already been doing with mind control, drugs and human experimentation. I am going to give you a brief synopsis of what was taking place and I’ll save a more in-depth version for part two.

CIA and Mind Control

The CIA’s interest in mind control goes all the way back to the agency’s founding in 1947. From the very beginning, developing methods to control and manipulate the human mind was a priority.

Beginning in the early 1950s, the CIA conducted an enormous series of experiments involving drugs, hypnosis, sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation, isolation, behavior modification and other methods of manipulating human behavior.

The most infamous of these programs was MKULTRA.

Hundreds of experiments were conducted on prisoners, psychiatric patients and other vulnerable people, many of whom had no idea they were being used as human guinea pigs. Researchers experimented with psychoactive drugs, hypnosis, extreme isolation, sleep deprivation and intense psychological pressure. They also studied group behavior and whether these techniques could be used to influence groups of people.

After decades of research into controlling human behavior, the CIA supposedly shut the program down and destroyed much of its documentation.

But here is the question that matters for Jonestown:

Did the research actually end, or did it simply move somewhere else? Instead of experimenting on individual human guinea pigs, did the research expand to entire groups of people, using what we now call cults as the laboratory?

Because think about what you would need to conduct an experiment like that without attracting attention.

An isolated population. Control over their food, sleep, work and communication. Access to drugs. A closed environment where people could be subjected to extreme psychological pressure without outsiders seeing what was happening.

And look at what was happening at the same time.

Cults were exploding across America and most of them weren’t exactly operating out of somebody’s basement. They had enormous amounts of money, sophisticated operations, connections to organized crime and powerful people and, in some cases, a remarkable ability to avoid serious scrutiny from law enforcement.

Hint: the Manson “Family” did not appear out of no where. They were a CIA creation.

So back to Jonestown:

Four years after MKULTRA was supposedly terminated, hundreds of vulnerable Americans were living almost completely cut off from the outside world in the middle of the Guyanese jungle.

They were being drugged. They were deprived of sleep and subjected to isolation, sensory deprivation, forced labor, humiliation and physical abuse. Their food, work, communication and movement were controlled.

And Jonestown had a massive stockpile of psychoactive drugs.

All of the markings of an MKULTRA experiment.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Wrapping Everything Up

So what is the evidence of a connection between MKULTRA and Jonestown, besides everything I’ve already mentioned?

Let’s go through it.

• First, look at the cover-up following the deaths in Guyana. Even a superficial review of what happened raises serious questions about the actions of the military, police, State Department and media. Something on that scale could only have been orchestrated at the very highest levels.

• Then look at what was happening for years before the deaths. Reports and allegations surrounding the Peoples Temple and Jonestown repeatedly reached the press and law-enforcement agencies, yet somehow they continued to look the other way. I don’t believe something like that happens spontaneously. Someone got to them.

• Then there is the strange contradiction inside Jonestown itself. This supposedly humanitarian community had remarkably modern and extensive medical services, while at the same time people were being subjected to drugs, behavior modification and other extreme forms of coercion, up to and including murder. But maybe that isn’t a contradiction at all. We have already seen the same disturbing combination inside the American prison system and state psychiatric hospitals.

• There were enough drugs stockpiled there to drug 200,000 people for more than a year. Those drugs did not just appear in Jonestown. Someone obtained them and brought them into the middle of the Guyanese jungle. That required planning. Who did this? And how was it done?

• Look at what happened to people once they arrived in Guyana. Members of Jones’ “church” were bound and gagged immediately after landing and taken to the compound, where residents were subjected to forced drugging.

• Then look at the conditions people were living under. Jonestown residents were packed into cramped quarters and surviving on meager rations of food that was often spoiled. They were forced to work 16 to 18 hours a day, and when they weren’t working, they could be kept awake day and night listening to Jim Jones lecture.

• And the punishments sound eerily familiar after everything we’ve just covered. Residents were subjected to forced drugging, sensory deprivation inside an underground box, physical torture, beatings, verbal abuse, public sexual rapes and humiliation.

The drugs being pumped into people at Jonestown, combined with sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation, forced labor, isolation, humiliation and physical abuse, were the same kinds of methods that had already been used and studied under MKULTRA.

But it gets even more interesting when you look at who was living at Jonestown.

A 1974 government report acknowledged that behavioral experiments had targeted specific populations, including black people, women, prisoners, the elderly, children and psychiatric patients. These people were used as guinea pigs to test drugs, brain implants and psychosurgery at an isolated military missile base in California.

Now look at Jonestown.

Roughly 90 percent of the dead were women. Around 80 percent were black. And 276 were children.

These weren’t just similar methods being used on people. They were the same kinds of vulnerable populations the government had already identified and used for human experimentation.

Congressman Ryan, known for being a critic of the CIA, may have suspected that Jonestown was being used as a front for something far more sinister.

In 1980, Ryan’s aide Joseph Holsinger was given a paper that challenged the government’s claim that MKULTRA had ended in 1973.

The paper argued that the CIA’s mind-control experiments never actually stopped. Instead, they continued in places where vulnerable people could be isolated and controlled, including public hospitals, prisons and religious cults, with those institutions essentially providing cover for the experimentation.

Holsinger later appeared at a San Francisco psychology forum on Jonestown and publicly stated that he believed the CIA had worked with Jim Jones to conduct medical and mind-control experiments through the Peoples Temple.

Holsinger had worked for the Congressman who traveled to Jonestown specifically to investigate what was happening there and who was murdered before he ever made it home.

Michael Meiers, author of Was Jonestown a CIA Medical Experiment?, came to an extraordinary conclusion about Dr. Laurence Layton, the same man we discussed earlier who had served as head of the Army’s Chemical Warfare Division.

Meiers wrote:

The Jonestown experiment was conceived by Dr. Layton, staffed by Dr. Layton and financed by Dr. Layton. It was as much his project as it was Jim Jones’.

Former the Peoples Temple member Joyce Shaw was asking disturbing questions of her own. She wondered whether Jonestown had been “some kind of horrible government experiment.”

And then, in October 1981, Jonestown survivors took their suspicions to court.

They filed a $63 million lawsuit against former Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and former CIA Director Stansfield Turner alleging that the State Department and CIA had conspired to “enhance the economic and political powers of James Warren Jones” and had conducted “mind control and drug experimentation” at Jonestown.

Four months later, the lawsuit was dismissed for “failure to prosecute timely.” Requests to appeal were denied.

So after everything we’ve gone through, the massive stockpile of psychoactive drugs, the forced drugging, sleep deprivation and isolation, the vulnerable populations Jones deliberately surrounded himself with, the strange intelligence connections, the years of government mind-control experimentation that preceded Jonestown, and finally survivors themselves accusing the CIA and State Department of using Jonestown for mind-control and drug experiments, I want to ask what you think:

Was Jonestown a CIA mind control experiment?

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

A Note on Sources

This investigation draws extensively from previous research into Jonestown, Peoples Temple, intelligence connections and government mind-control programs. In particular, I relied on the work of investigative journalist Jim Hougan, the research collected at Whale.to, and “The Penal Colony,” a 1979 paper later presented by Congressman Leo Ryan aide Joseph Holsinger and preserved by the Jonestown & Peoples Temple archive at San Diego State University.

I have directly quoted portions of these sources, paraphrased and condensed portions of their research, independently reorganized the material, and added my own research, analysis and commentary throughout.

I strongly encourage readers interested in going further down this rabbit hole to read the original sources themselves:

Jim Hougan, “Jim Jones, Dan Mitrione and the Peoples Temple”
Read Jim Hougan’s original article

Jonestown research archived at Whale.to
Read the source material

“The Penal Colony,” Jonestown & Peoples Temple: A Digital Archive, San Diego State University
Read “The Penal Colony”

We’re going into details about this case that most people have never heard before.

This includes pedophilia, powerful elites, child trafficking rings, and some of the suspicious characters surrounding JonBenét before and after her murder.

Some of what you’re about to read is deeply disturbing.

Keep reading if you dare…

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

JonBenét Patricia Ramsey was six years old when she was found dead inside her family’s Boulder, Colorado home on December 26, 1996.

Her lifeless body was found lying on a cold basement floor, wrapped in a blanket. She had been sexually abused, severely beaten about the head—causing a massive skull fracture—and then strangled to death. She was dressed in a sweatshirt that covered a long-sleeved undershirt. White pajama bottoms covered her white panties, which were stained with blood.

Nearly thirty years later, her murder remains one of the most infamous unsolved cases in American history. But there are parts of the Ramsey story that rarely get the same attention as the ransom note, the pageants, or the endless speculation over what happened inside that house.

First, JonBenét’s father, John Ramsey, wasn’t simply a wealthy businessman.

John had served as a Naval officer and pilot in the Philippines during the late 1960s before entering the business world and eventually forming Access Graphics.

By 1996, the year JonBenét was killed, Access Graphics had reportedly surpassed $1 billion in annual sales.

The company later became a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin, one of the largest military and intelligence contractors in the country.

After the buyout, John remained president and CEO of Access Graphics, and in 1995, he was made a vice president of Lockheed Martin.

Her mother, Patsy Ramsey, had her own unusual background. Before becoming JonBenét’s mother and introducing her daughter to the pageant world, Patsy had been a pageant star herself. She won Miss West Virginia in 1977 and later served as an official hostess for the state of West Virginia, a public-facing role that involved representing the state and welcoming visitors at official events and functions. She later moved into advertising in Atlanta, where she eventually met John.

JonBenét also had a nine-year-old brother, Burke Ramsey, living in the home at the time of her death, as well as three older half-siblings from John Ramsey’s previous marriage: Elizabeth, Melinda, and John Andrew. Elizabeth had died in a car accident four years earlier, in 1992.

THE NIGHT BEFORE THE MURDER…

The evening before JonBenét was found dead inside her family’s home, the Ramseys had spent Christmas night at a party hosted by Fleet White Jr., John Ramsey’s best friend.

According to the Ramseys’ account of that night, the family left the Whites’ Christmas party at around 9:00 PM. On the way home, they made a couple of stops to drop off Christmas gifts to friends before returning to their Boulder home, where they said JonBenét and Burke were put to bed.

It’s important to understand the world we’re dealing with here. The Ramseys were extremely wealthy and many of the people surrounding them, both before and after JonBenét’s death, moved in similarly wealthy and influential circles. These people would be considered the ‘elite.’

Fleet White Jr. was no exception. His father was an incredibly wealthy businessman whose oil company was sold to Exxon for a substantial sum. These weren’t ordinary families living ordinary lives in Boulder. There was serious money and political connections surrounding the people at the center of this case.

It’s also interesting to note that Fleet White Jr’s son is a U.S. Navy veteran and is currently serving as the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

THE MORNING OF THE MURDER…

Early the next morning, Patsy Ramsey said she discovered something bizarre inside the house: a two-and-a-half-page ransom note claiming that JonBenét had been kidnapped by a “small foreign faction.”

JonBenét was nowhere to be found, and Patsy called 911 to report her daughter missing. But the Ramseys also began calling people from their inner circle to the house, including Fleet Jr. and Priscilla White, John and Barbara Fernie, their pastor, Rol Hoverstock and JonBenét’s pediatrician, Dr. Francesco Beuf.

By the time Boulder police arrived, what should have been treated as a tightly controlled potential kidnapping scene was filled with family friends and other people moving through the Ramsey home.

And somehow, despite a six-year-old child supposedly being kidnapped from the house and an extraordinary ransom note sitting inside it, no police detective arrived until after 8:00 that morning, when Boulder detective Linda Arndt finally arrived.

Arndt would later describe being left essentially alone inside an increasingly chaotic and emotionally charged house. She said she repeatedly requested backup from her superiors but the help she was asking for never arrived.

Hours passed.

Finally, at around 1:00 PM, Arndt instructed John Ramsey and Fleet White to search the house again for anything that seemed unusual.

John went into the basement, opened the door to a small cellar room, and found JonBenét’s body.

The six-year-old girl that everyone believed had been kidnapped had been inside the Ramsey home the entire time.

JonBenét was dead. There had been no kidnapping. The ransom note was a fraud.

One officer had this to say about John and Patsy’s reactions to the discovery of the body:

What was interesting was when John Ramsey brought the body upstairs he never cried. But when he laid her down, he started to moan, while peering around to see who was looking.

Patsy, he said, “peered at him through splayed fingers” while making sobbing sounds. The officer described being haunted by the manner in which Patsy kept staring at him. He also noted that he never saw either of the Ramsey’s attempt to comfort or console the other.

But there’s another 911 call from the Ramsey house that almost never gets talked about.

Just three days before JonBenét was found dead, someone called 911 from the Ramsey home during a Christmas party on December 23.

There were around 100 people at the house that night, including some of the most prominent members of Boulder’s elite society.

And here’s the strange part: we still don’t know who all of those people were or why someone called 911 that night.

The full guest list has never been made public.

Neither has the reason for the call.

A PEDOPHILE RING

So what actually happened to JonBenét Ramsey and why did the murder of this particular child become a national obsession?

Children are murdered in America far more often than most people want to think about yet those cases rarely receive anything close to the wall-to-wall attention JonBenét’s death did.

So what was different about this one and what are we to make of the Ramsey case?

Because once you start digging into what actually happened after JonBenét was murdered, the cover-up becomes impossible to ignore. This investigation was compromised from day one and that kind of protection doesn’t happen without systemic corruption.

From the earliest days of the investigation there were allegations involving child pornography and people connected to the Ramsey family, alongside serious questions about whether investigators actually followed those leads.

Police records show that warrants were obtained to search the Ramsey home for pornographic material. The San Jose Mercury News reported that investigators:

had a strong suspicion that someone in the family had an interest in child pornography…three days after the girl’s bludgeoned body was discovered in the basement of her family’s upscale home, Boulder police seized computers, computer disks, CD-ROMs, video and still photography equipment, according to the search warrants.

Police seized at least 150 videotapes from the Ramsey home. 150 videotapes!

There were also allegations that John Ramsey had been seen frequenting a sketchy Denver porno shop and that computers at Access Graphics contained child pornography.

Then there was therapist Mary Bienkowski, who spoke of a pedophile ring operating around Boulder. Bienkowski said a client she had treated for ten years was a former victim of the ring and claimed it had direct connections to the Ramsey family.

Even more disturbing, Bienkowski said her client had given police the names of several people who witnessed JonBenét’s murder along with evidence that other children were still being abused.

The woman was reportedly interviewed by the FBI. Shortly afterward, she went into hiding because she was afraid for her life.

There is no indication that the leads she provided about JonBenét’s murder were ever investigated.

Then there was Randy Simons who was considered one of the best and most expensive child photographers in the Boulder area.

In June 1996, Simons took what were described as “cover-girl” photographs of JonBenét and also photographed her on several occasions with her best friend, Daphne White, Fleet White’s daughter.

Shortly after JonBenét was killed, Simons abruptly left his wife and daughter in Denver and moved to a remote area. No one seemed to know why he had done so.

Simons also sold his portfolio of JonBenét photographs for $7,500 after her death. Then, in 1998, he was arrested after being found walking naked in the street. During the arrest he reportedly blurted out, “I didn’t kill JonBenét!”

One year later, in 2019, Simons was charged with 15 counts of possessing child pornography.

There were other disturbing connections in Colorado as well.

During the Wonderland child-pornography raids in 1998, which took place across several cities in the United States, authorities arrested Richard Bruce Thomas, a computer consultant who lived in Fort Collins, Colorado, roughly an hour away from the Ramsey home.

His role in the network is unknown, but he was found dead the next day of as always, a purported suicide.

The police never examined his hard drive despite his proximity to Boulder and nature as a potential suspect.

Interestingly, the Wonderland raids commenced on September 1, with Thomas being found dead on September 6, and the Ramsey grand jury convened shortly thereafter on September 15.

The timing could suggest that the FBI suppressed the grand jury, which risked revealing a pedophile ring, until the raids were done, either to protect their sting operation or (if their motivation was more sinister) give themselves a chance to clean up the evidence.1

Then there was James Partin, who was arrested for distributing child pornography online. Investigators reportedly found a photograph of JonBenét Ramsey inside his home. Partin was also the prime suspect in the 1983 disappearance of a 14-year-old girl from Idaho Springs, Colorado.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

APPARENT ODDITIES

• The ransom note was more than two pages long with nonstop rambling. It was written on Patsy Ramsey’s own notepad and it was found in the same house as the supposed kidnapping victim’s body. This is the only known case in criminal history where a ransom note was left in the same location as the victim’s body.

• The author of this supposed “ransom note” demanded a ransom of exactly $118,000 in cash, which happened to be the amount of the Christmas bonus that John had received.

• JonBenét’s body was hidden in an out-of-the-way room in the basement. John and Patsy themselves said it was the kind of location that only somebody already familiar with the house and the family’s patterns would know about.

• Then there’s Patsy’s 911 call. Dispatcher Kim Archuleta said Patsy apparently thought she had hung up, but the line remained open. Archuleta said she heard Patsy’s entire demeanor change once she believed nobody on the other end was listening.

• And nobody reacted when the 10:00 AM deadline passed. The ransom note said the kidnappers would call between 8:00 and 10:00 that morning. Ten o’clock came and went, the kidnappers never called, and nobody in the house appeared to react to the fact that the deadline had just passed.

SEXUAL ABUSE

This is where the case becomes even more disturbing.

• The official autopsy: Boulder County coroner Dr. John Meyer documented physical injury to JonBenét’s genital area. His report described inflammation and “epithelial erosion,” meaning that the surface layer of tissue had been damaged or worn away. In other words, this wasn’t simply redness. There was actual injury to the tissue in the genital area of a six-year-old child. Meyer documented those injuries in the autopsy report, although he stopped short of explicitly stating in the report that they were the result of sexual abuse.

• What Meyer allegedly said privately: Detective Linda Arndt later swore in an affidavit that Meyer told her privately that somebody had sexual contact with JonBenét.

• The outside forensic experts: Early in the investigation, Boulder police assembled a panel of respected forensic pathologists from around the country to examine the medical evidence. They concluded that JonBenét had been sexually abused, with nearly unanimous agreement that the evidence indicated both acute abuse around the time of her death and chronic abuse predating that night.

• Dr. Robert Kirschner: The University of Chicago forensic pathologist concluded that JonBenét’s genital injuries were consistent with digital penetration “that night as well as previous molestation.”

• Dr. Cyril Wecht: Wecht reached the same conclusion after examining the findings contained in Meyer’s autopsy report. In his book Who Killed JonBenét Ramsey?, however, he went even further, developing his theory that JonBenét’s death occurred during a sexual encounter or “sex game” that turned fatal.

• JonBenét’s pediatrician, Dr. Francesco Beuf: Beuf maintained that he had never seen any evidence that JonBenét had been sexually abused. But if multiple forensic experts believed that JonBenét showed signs of chronic sexual abuse, how did the doctor who had been treating her miss it?

LAW ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE (OR LACK THEREOF)

A telltale sign of a protected pedophile operation is a law enforcement investigation that has been compromised, obstructed, or deliberately steered away from the truth.

And one of the most blatant examples of that happened the moment JonBenét’s body was discovered, when normal police procedure seemed to go completely out the window.

John Ramsey picked up his daughter’s lifeless body and removed the tape from her mouth. Strangely, the autopsy report would later make no mention of tape residue around her mouth. He then carried JonBenét upstairs and laid her on the floor.

Side note: I know people react to unimaginable trauma in different ways, but I still find this incredibly strange. Your six-year-old daughter is lying dead on the basement floor and your immediate instinct is to pick up her body and carry her upstairs? I mean, seriously. I cannot even imagine being coherent enough in that moment to do anything other than completely lose my mind.

After John Ramsey brought Jonbenét upstairs, Patsy immediately collapsed over her daughter’s body. A detective then moved JonBenét’s body again and covered her with a blanket.

Within a matter of minutes, some of the most crucial evidence in the entire case had been hopelessly contaminated.

And that was hardly the only problem with the investigation.

Here’s just a few more examples:

• Detective Linda Arndt repeatedly asked for backup that never came. She was left trying to control a house full of people while investigating a missing six-year-old child. The department’s failure to properly secure the scene would later be blamed on Arndt herself, leading to accusations that she was being made the scapegoat for failures that went far above her.

• An FBI agent said high-level command staff “inhibited the officers and the detectives from doing the job that they knew they needed to do,” including interfering with efforts to separate John and Patsy Ramsey for questioning. Separating the prime suspects so their stories could be compared independently is Investigating 101. So why was Boulder Police leadership getting in the way of their own detectives doing this?

• Detective Linda Arndt eventually said she feared for her own safety because of the people inside the Boulder Police Department. She claimed she was being targeted from within the department while damaging information about her was being fed to the media. She also said that she was simultaneously prohibited from publicly defending herself. Arndt eventually sued the City of Boulder and two of its police chiefs over how she was treated.

• Investigators became fixated on the “Patsy Did It” theory. Multiple investigators were accused of failing to properly follow up on reports that fibers consistent with John Ramsey’s shirt were found in JonBenét’s underwear.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

CHILD SEX RING THEORY

If you’ve been following my work, you already know I’ve reported extensively on organized child sexual abuse involving wealthy and powerful people, including the Franklin scandal.

What matters here is that Colorado itself appears repeatedly in some of these stories. And once you start looking at what was happening in and around the state, the child sex ring theory in the JonBenét case becomes impossible to discuss without looking at that history.

• Franklin child sex ring: Many victims of this network, including 1982 abduction victim Johnny Gosch, were held captive at a ranch house in Buena Vista, Colorado. They were taken across the country to service members of the political and business elite, including at other locations throughout Colorado. Even more disturbing, the message “Johnny Gosch was here” was found written in red nail polish on the bathroom wall of a Mexican restaurant in Lakewood, Colorado. Paul Bonacci identified it as a message written during a trip to Denver where he, Johnny, and other children had been taken.

• Pat Sullivan case: Former Arapahoe County Sheriff Pat Sullivan was a nationally renowned lawman before he was busted trading meth for sex with a young man. Sullivan later admitted that this was part of a broader pattern of behavior, including disturbing admissions that some of his victims had been drugged and others were children. Many researchers believed that Sullivan was not operating alone and he was only one player in a much larger pedophile network operating across Colorado.

• Aurora Police Department: Former officer Michael Mangino pleaded guilty to sexually exploiting a 15-year-old girl. A later lawsuit alleged that Aurora Police had already received a sexual-misconduct complaint against Mangino but a sergeant destroyed it without opening an investigation. Mangino later claimed sexual misconduct was widespread inside the department and protected by supervisors.

ONE LAST NOTE

If the pedophile ring allegations are true, and I’m inclined to believe that they are, then it is more than likely JonBenét’s parents were involved in some capacity. And considering everything we know about the disturbing exploitation and abuse that can take place within the beauty pageant world, I don’t think that possibility is much of a stretch.

That theory became significantly more interesting in 2013 when previously sealed records revealed that a grand jury had ruled in 1999 to indict both John and Patsy Ramsey as accessories to their daughter’s murder. The indictments alleged that each parent had permitted JonBenét to be placed in a situation that posed a threat of injury resulting in her death and that each had helped someone responsible for the crime in an effort to prevent that person from being prosecuted.

The indictments were never pursued by the district attorney and they did not identify who the grand jury believed actually killed JonBenét.

Nearly thirty years later, what happened inside the Ramsey home that night remains a mystery, but I’d love to hear your thoughts on the case.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

It’s honestly WILD how many insane news stories get almost no coverage, so when you bring one up to somebody, you sound like an absolute nutcase.

Here’s a perfect example.

I bet you didn’t hear that HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL just paid MILLIONS to settle lawsuits because they were selling HUMAN BODY PARTS on the BLACK MARKET.

?!??!?!?!?!

The guy at the center of it was Cedric Lodge, the morgue manager at Harvard Medical School. Families donated the bodies of their loved ones to Harvard for medical research and education, trusting one of the most prestigious universities in the world to treat those remains with some dignity.

Instead, Lodge was stealing pieces of their bodies and selling them to private buyers.

Brains. Hands. Faces. Skin.

In one case, he sold human skin to a buyer so that he could tan it and make a leather-bound book.

I’m sorry, WHAT?!

And this wasn’t some guy who got caught doing it once. This went on for FIVE YEARS, from January 2018 through March 2023.

Forty-seven families sued Harvard and the university ultimately agreed to a $53 million settlement.

Personally, that seems pretty dang low to me.

If I donated my mother’s body to Harvard for medical research and later found out that somebody working there CUT OFF HER FACE and sold it to some stranger on the black market so he could turn her skin into a leather-bound book, I’m sorry, but I’d want a hell of a lot more than a million dollars.

And guess how much prison time Cedric Lodge got for this?

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Eight years.

His wife got one year because she was helping him.

So this man was entrusted with the bodies of people whose families donated them to one of the most prestigious medical schools in the world, spent years stealing pieces of those bodies and selling them to strangers, and all he got was eight years in prison.

People have literally done more time for selling weed.

But here’s where this gets even weirder.

A couple of weeks ago, I reported on another body-parts smuggling operation involving a Detroit warehouse where authorities discovered roughly 1,200 human heads and fetal remains.

And once you start digging into THAT operation, the story gets even more disturbing because the network stretched far beyond one warehouse, including connections involving Israel and the U.S. military.

Which obviously makes me wonder: did any of the body parts stolen from Harvard end up in Israel too? Harvard was/is heavily involved in MK Ultra and these sorts of people never work alone.

Considering what I found while investigating the Detroit operation, it’s a question I’d certainly like answered.

If you missed that investigation, you can read it here:

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

A Nation Shattered

The modern United States can divide its history into two periods:

The period before the September 11 attacks against the United States and the period after.

The attacks remain the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil ever to take place.

They united a nation - then, improbably, divided it, as the proponents of the resulting wars adopted torture, war crimes, and oil thefts en masse in the Middle East while killing over a million people, and its opponents grew increasingly suspicious that the official story of the attacks was full of holes and discrepancies.

Sorry, folks. But the “conspiracy theorists” are right.

I am a whistleblower from a high-ranking American family.

I publish under a pseudonym - my real last name is on the side of a Federal headquarters in Arlington.

What I tell you may shock the mind, but it is true:

The ClA under the Bushes and Israel’s Mоssad under Sharon and Bibi attacked the United States on September 11, 2001, in order to provide a pretext to loot the U.S. Treasury, declare war on all of lsrael’s neighbors, and secure a future for the Zionist project - all paid for by the blood and treasure of the United States.

Before we start, it is important to realize that the information in this article is only the briefest introduction to this subject. People have short attention spans. But entire books can be written about this subject - and should be.

Operation Northwoods

First, let’s examine an important predecessor to all of this:

There’s an easy rebuttal to those who say that the U.S. government would never plan an attack on its own citizens.

In fact, the ClA planned a potential attack on American citizens as early as 1962.

It was called Operation Northwoods and it was a plan to bomb a U.S. city and blame it on the Cubans as a pretext to invade Cuba if necessary.

Northwoods was never used. But the Bushes would have known of its existence. Remember, George H.W. Bush ran the ClA before ascending to the Presidency.

Eventually other steps than Northwoods were decided on - such as the murder of President Kennedy, an act which it is alleged George H.W. Bush may have overseen as a young ClA agent in Dallas on November 22, 1963.

This is by no means proof that 9/11 was an inside job. We will shortly discuss plenty of evidence of that.

What it is proof of, however, is the presence of a deviant mentality at the ClA as early as 1962 - one that was willing to bomb its own citizens in order to start the wars it wanted to get.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

A Troubling Portent

In October 2000, approximately 11 months before 9/11, a retired Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) officer that went into hiding even though he was a veteran of the Yom Kippur War (1973), was collecting English Ivy Cuttings at the Gomel Chesed Cemetery located at McClellan and 245 Mount Olive Avenue, which is near the city lines of Elizabeth and Newark, New Jersey. The Gomel Chesed Cemetery is a Jewish cemetery.

The man overheard a conversation spoken in Hebrew, which drew his attention. He hid behind an 8-foot tall retaining wall and listened in to their conversation as they stood below. Shortly after a Lincoln town car approached the two people and the man in the backseat got out to greet them. After normal niceties were exchanged the third man said:

“The Americans will learn what it is to live with terrorists after the planes hit the twins in September.”

One of the men that had been leaning against the retaining wall expressed concerns that the upcoming presidential election (November 2000) might impact the plans. The man that arrived in the Town Car quelled the doubts by saying:

“Don’t worry, we have people in high places and no matter who gets elected, they will take care of everything.”

The observer who overheard this conversation related it to the FBI on numerous occasions only to be ignored each time. Nothing was done about it, and no investigation into the incident has ever taken place.

“The New Pearl Harbor”

In another highly telling bit of foreshadowing, the neoconservative thinktank The Project For The New American Century wrote about the need to “revolutionize military affairs” one year before 9/11, in the whitepaper “Rebuilding America’s Defenses.”

This whitepaper stressed the need to spend vast great hundreds of billions past what was already budgeted for the then-Defense Department and contained an astonishing sentence:

Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.

The full whitepaper can be read by clicking on this sentence, if anyone is interested.

One year later, America was attacked.

We have never been the same since.

Rumsfeld Announces The Defense Department Is Missing Trillions

On September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced a $2.3 trillion gap in Defense funds that could not be accounted for in the latest audit.

The audit data had been available since early that year. But Rumsfeld chose September 10 to make the announcement. Why?

Well, the news completely vanished from the next day’s news cycle, for obvious reasons.

Now let’s get to the attacks themselves - and all the strange “coincidences” around them.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

The “Five Dancing lsraelis”

Five dancing, laughing Israeli men with connections to Mоssad were arrested on September 11, 2001 for filming themselves dancing, laughing, and cheering, with a camcorder pointed at the attacks recording them, taking selfies of themselves with a lit cigarette lighter in front of the burning Towers.

Israeli nationals Sivan Kurzberg, his brother Paul, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shmuel, and Omer Marmari were arrested that day for celebrating the 9/11 attacks loudly from a nearby rooftop.

How did they know to be there?

Why would they cheer an attack on their ostensible allies?

The U.S. citizens who phoned in the incident thought, in some cases, that these Israelis were actually Muslim terrorists.

Kurzberg, as it turns out, is ex-Mоssad.

The five men were arrested, processed - then the Bush Administration interceded, invoked Federal power, and had them quietly scrubbed from the news cycle and deported to Israel with zero investigation or punishment.

The Bush Administration didn’t need to investigate. They knew full well they had hired Kurzberg and his companions and all the other lsraelis at Urban Moving Systems and the “art students” who really wired the Towers for demolition in order to destroy the Towers from the inside out.

Sivan and his pals blew it, however.

They weren’t supposed to celebrate 9/11 in public, nor the coming “realignment” of American priorities with Israeli military priorities, so openly where Americans could see them.

A Controlled Demolition

For months before the attack on the Towers, a company called Urban Moving Systems was involved in doing logistics for the Towers.

A ring of Israeli “art students” was also “studying” at the Towers during this period.

These were Mоssad operatives. Their job was to wire the Twin Towers for demolition.

Experts like Richard Gage and other 9/11 Truth engineers have spent decades analyzing and debunking the attacks, concluding that a series of internal explosions took place, weakening the support columns and finally bringing the buildings down in a very controlled demolition - along with forgotten third Tower, World Trade Center 7 - which also collapsed later in the day.

Its owner, Larry Silverstein, admitted that afternoon that the decision was made to “pull it” (demolish the building) late in the day, in contrast to many official news reports.

World Trade Center Building 7 is alleged to have been the headquarters for the ClA/Mоssad planning station overseeing the attacks. It is believed that this building was demolished to hide evidence of the Able Danger program that had planned the attacks, while the U.S. gold reserves under WTC7 were stolen and replaced with gold-plated tungsten bars, which are nearly worthless in comparison to real gold.

Silverstein then collected billions in “Liberty Bonds” to rebuild the Tower complex at U.S. taxpayer expense - $2 billion immediately, and eventually collecting some four to eight billion dollars according to various estimates. By an astonishing coincidence, Silverstein had missed work at the 9/11 complex on the day of the attacks as well. Silverstein’s partners in this enterprise include nosebleed-level personnel from Rоckefeller-and-Morgan-family-owned JP Morgan Chase.

It has been very lucrative for all parties.

Mainstream American media will not revisit this because the attacks were ordered at the highest levels of the Bush Administration, by the Bush family themselves, and in tandem with the Rоthschilds of Israel.

This operation was orchestrated by players at the highest levels of world power.

United 93 And The Pentagоn Crash

United 93 and American 77 - the plane that was supposed to “attack the White Hоuse” and the “plane” that hit the Pentagon respectively - are even weirder.

Whatever hit the Pentagon was not a plane. Air traffic controllers from that day who saw its trajectory said this was impossible - but possible for a drone or cruise missile.

Meanwhile, the supposed field in which United 93 “crashed” was almost completely devoid of real fuselage and rubble in official photos of that event as well.

Many death records from these flights are completely missing from the Social Security Death Index.

And rumor has it that personnel at the Pentagon who had challenged the Bushes, Rumsfeld, et al. before 9/11 had been quietly reshuffled into exactly the region of the Pentagоn that was attacked.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

The Dead Whistleblowers

Two of America’s most important whistleblowers are people most Americans have never heard of.

Milton William “Bill” Cooper was an ardent journalist covering the deep state who predicted 9/11 months in advance. He also made some wild claims - such as the one that extraterrestrials were working with the U.S. government. Shortly after 9/11, Cooper’s home was raided by Federal agents and he was brutally killed.

Beverly “Bev” Eckert was a 9/11 widow who refused to accept the official word of the 9/11 Commission. She was notoriously described as a “loudmouth” who insisted on further investigations for her dead husband. She met Barack Obama in 2009 and shook his hand. A few months later, the plane she was on dropped out of the sky and killed everyone on it.

These are not accidents, though it took me years to learn the truth. There is no doubt in my mind that Bill Cooper and Bev Eckert were murdered by the same cabal that orchestrated 9/11 because these whistleblowers insisted on the truth above all things. And in this case, the truth is poison to the thousands of people in Washington and in the U.S. Armed Forces who are aware of this conspiracy and have participated in the illegal orders to have it hidden.

“I’ll Be Long Gone Before Some Smart Person Figures Out What Happened In This Oval Office”

In May of 2008, George W.Bush gave a very curious interview from the Oval Office to Israel’s Ha’aretz News.

This interview, most of which was an apparent postmortem on what Bush considered a drawdown in the Iraq War, at the end nevertheless contained an astonishing one-line zinger:

I’ll be long gone before some smart person figures out what happened in this Oval Office.

-President George W Bush, to Ha’aretz News, May 12, 2008

What the Hell?

After the rest of the dots we’ve connected here, it’s not hard to finally see what he meant.

Bush was wrong. Lots of people, in the end, figured out what happened in his Oval Office - that he colluded with lsrael and the Saudis to commit high treason, terrorism, and mass murder against the United States of America.

George W. Bush wanted the 9/11 attacks to succeed. He had, indeed, helped plan them with his father, with New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, with lsraeli government heads Ariel Sharоn and Benjamin Netаnyahu, with Mоssad-Defense liason Dоv Zakheim - and with Lord Jacоb Rоthschild, billionaire lsraeli shadow financier.

Thankfully, we still have a loophole in the Presidential immunity that so disgustingly grants the President protection by a Supreme Court of Republican sycophants.

Much of the 9/11 planning took place prior to 2000. Bush came into office with fully-formed plans to attack 7 countries in a decade. General Wesley Clark has stated that he was given plans indicating the U.S. planned to attack Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia and Sudan before finally moving on to lran.

And crimes committed before or after the Presidency are still prosecutable, even if the person who committed them was a U.S. President.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

The Big Lie Of Our Time

People tell me that this research is too improbable - that the Bushes would never betray America that way.

That’s nonsense. The Bushes have been betraying America for a hundred years. The Bushes worked with the actual, historical Nazis. The Bushes were implicated in an actual plot to overthrow the government of the United States under Franklin Delano Roosevelt, called the Business Plot - this according to former U.S. general Smedley Butler. The Bushes even ran the ClA.

Of course the Bushes would betray America. That’s all they do.

But more specifically, this technique is one they learned from the Nazis.

The Germans call it große Lüge - the Big Lie.

The principle is the same as bluffing in poker. When you lie - lie so outrageously that nobody could possibly believe you, so that you may then take the entire pot. No less a monster than Adolf Hitler himself described the way the technique works on the common people:

It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.

-Adolf Hitler

And in this case the bluff took the entire pot.

Despite the clear and present evidence that our government will attack our own when it suits the military-industrial complex and their interests, the lie has been accepted by historians.

It is taught to small children as gospel and that anyone who challenges it is “evil” and a “conspiracy theorist.”

This has suited the neoconservatives, Zionists, and the billionaires behind them perfectly. It has created a world beyond their wildest dreams where over a trillion dollars a year is spent on the U.S. military - much of it flat-out embezzled - even as the quality of our materiel and command degrades.

Just look at the rusted-out, nearly-unfit-for-service condition of the USS Lincoln after it was kept on the longest naval deployment in U.S. history (including World War II) in this new Iran War.

This level of rust - caused by a failure to drydock a ship properly in time for careening - can be fatal to a vessel. The USS Lincoln cost $2.24 billion in 1982 dollars. That’s equivalent to about six to seven billion dollars in 2026 dollars.

There was no need for this. The U.S. has plenty of aircraft carriers that could have relieved the Lincoln long enough to have it careened, or at least be sea scraped and repainted.

But Trump doesn’t care about our troops. He is, according to high-ranking ex-Mоssad agent Ari Ben-Menashe, completely compromised by the volume of kompromat Bibi has on him. He does what lsrael tells him to.

Nobody is coming to save us but us.

And that starts with challenging the fundamental Big Lie of our time. We must challenge the narrative of the grand crime on which all modern U.S. imperial power was founded, the grand excuse to abrogate the Constitution endlessly in the name of “terrorism,” and the grand theft of trillions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money to send to mercenaries and foreign powers that, in reality, hate us.

A Final Postscript

Let’s also be clear: I’ve reached out using my own connections to confirm this all. When I first found all this out, deep-state operatives came out of the woodwork to congratulate me on my detective work - then to ask me to “join the winning side” or be forcibly silenced.

I had to go dark for years.

It’s not “maybe.” The ClA and Mоssad bombed America on September 11, 2001. I’ve had it confirmed by multiple high-level sources.

America was attacked, deluded, misdirected, and robbed by its own “allies” and intelligence services on that terrible day - 25 years ago today.

9/11 must be reinvestigated.

Thank you for your time.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

It was Shrove Tuesday, 1945, and Dresden was packed with helpless and terrified Christian refugees who had fled west with whatever they could carry as Stalin’s Red Army closed in behind them. They had poured into one of Germany’s most magnificent art cities believing Dresden might offer them some kind of refuge from a war that was swallowing everything around them.

That night, Dresden’s Lutheran and Catholic children were coming home from Mardi Gras celebrations scattered across the city. They were dressed in their festive Saxon folk costumes when they climbed aboard the train that would take them back to their families.

Within hours, Dresden would be burning.

The children were still riding the high of the night’s festivities, laughing and carrying on aboard the train before Ash Wednesday arrived on February 14 when even in the middle of a war their families would observe the solemn Christian remembrance of the passion and death of Jesus.

Then Allied fighter planes appeared overhead.
They spotted the civilian train below and opened fire.

Bullets ripped through the carriages packed with children. Glass shattered, metal tore apart, and blood poured from the wreckage. What had been a train full of laughing children only moments earlier had become a scene of carnage.

And yet this carnage barely registers in the American mind.

The holocaust of Dresden lasted two days and killed at least 100,000 civilians, yet like the atomic destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it is usually given little more than a few sentences or a paragraph buried in the back of a history book.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Now compare that with Holocaust Remembrance Day every April. There are ceremonies, school programs, political speeches and wall-to-wall media coverage, with everyone from the Vatican to the White House expected to publicly remember, mourn and apologize.

So where is that same ritual of remembrance for the German civilians burned alive in Dresden? Where is it for the Japanese civilians incinerated at Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Their dead receive nothing approaching the same cultural attention. Their suffering has never been given the same sacred place in our collective memory, and after eighty years, we should be willing to ask why. Why are some civilian victims remembered constantly, generation after generation, while others have been reduced to a paragraph in the back of a history book, if they are discussed at all?

The barely remembered German and Japanese victims of Allied war crimes were of the wrong race and religion.

By the spring of 1945, after executing the bombing holocaust unleashed against virtually every major German city, Winston Churchill could see the end of the Second World War approaching in Europe. He could also see what might follow. The estimated 500,000 German civilians incinerated under a bombing campaign he had championed could come back to haunt him and permanently stain the reputation he would carry into the postwar world.

So on March 28, 1945, Churchill issued a deceitful, back-stabbing memo attempting to shift the blame for the mass incineration of German civilians onto his own Bomber Command and, by insinuation, its commander Arthur Harris. The very airmen who had carried out Churchill’s orders would be denied a postwar campaign medal, while Harris himself was denied the prestigious title and national recognition normally bestowed on Britain’s senior wartime commanders by the British Crown.

Harris and Bomber Command had only been following Winston Churchill’s explicit orders, yet when the bloodshed threatened to stain his own legacy, Churchill attempted to shift responsibility onto the very corps of airmen who had carried out those orders and suffered some of the highest casualty rates of any branch of the British military.

Churchill, like many others, endeavored to blame Germany for being the first to terror-bomb civilians, pointing to Guernica and Rotterdam and claimed that thousands had been killed. Even one death is regrettable of course, but less than 100 people were killed in Guernica and less than a thousand in Rotterdam.

The Germans had pledged not to be the first to bomb civilian centers in Britain and almost a year after Britain declared war, Germany still had not dropped a single bomb on London. Churchill, however, had hoped they would carpet-bomb the city, giving him the excuse he needed to silence the large peace movement in England that had been dogging him throughout 1940.

That changed toward the end of August 1940, when a German bomber reportedly lost its way while flying up the Thames. Its orders were to attack an oil refinery, but it mistakenly dropped its bombs on London’s East End. Thankfully, no one was killed, but Churchill finally had the excuse he needed to massively retaliate against Berlin.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

He ordered roughly a hundred RAF bombers to attack the German capital despite warnings from his own commanders that the Luftwaffe would retaliate against London. Hitler responded in kind, the Blitz followed, and the British peace movement that had been dogging Churchill disappeared amid the smoke and flames.

At this juncture we pause to contemplate the bloody treason that was at the heart of Churchill’s soul: he wanted as many of his own English civilians in London to die as possible so he could point to their deaths as the justification for a total war against Germany; and he succeeded in his objective.

More than eighty years later, we are still being handed the same excuse for what Britain and the United States did to Dresden: Germany did it first. Germany bombed Guernica. Germany bombed Rotterdam. Look what Germany did to London.

Nothing that occurred in Guernica, Rotterdam, or for that matter London, begins to even approach the scale of the holocaust that the firebombs of Churchill’s and Franklin Roosevelt’s militaries inflicted on Dresden.

You won’t find any of these facts in Churchill’s own sprawling history of the war and you certainly won’t find any mainstream historians eager to linger on them. If you want the other side of this history, you have to be willing to read the revisionists, especially the ones the media demonizes.

And if you’re wondering where to even start, that’s exactly why I put together my Forbidden Reading List. You can find it here.

Many mainstream historians have no problem denying the holocaust casualty figure of 100,000 for Dresden, but God help any one of us who have the guts to doubt the Six Million casualty figure of the “Holocaust,” or even dares to use the word “holocaust” to describe what happened in Dresden.

I challenge any reader to go through legacy media coverage of the bombing of Dresden from the 1990s onward and count how many times they actually use the word “holocaust” to describe what happened there.

The extent to which we have imprisoned ourselves in an Orwellian dystopia becomes painfully obvious when you consider that simply violating the self-appointed Newspeak trademark surrounding the word “holocaust” can be treated as deeply insensitive or even “antisemitic.” Dare to apply that same word to the German cities that were incinerated or to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and watch how quickly people tell you that you’re not allowed to use it.

Except those war crimes were genuine holocausts by the literal dictionary definition of the word: “destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire.”

A half-million German civilians and three-quarters of a million Japanese civilians (including the victims of the fire-bombing of Tokyo) were indeed burned to death, yet it is a thought crime to say so. Tell me we are not all cowards for allowing truth itself to be forbidden.

You cannot claim ownership over a word and then demand that everyone ignore its actual definition when it is applied to victims you would rather not talk about.

There are mainstream historians who have built entire careers around stigmatizing anyone who dares question any part of the accepted Holocaust narrative, immediately branding them a “Holocaust denier.” Yet those same historians are perfectly free to deny that what happened in Dresden was a holocaust, with virtually no professional or social consequences whatsoever. They may do as they like with history in ways that the rest of us may not.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

This article was informed by the reporting and research of Michael Hoffman in The People Who Were Burned to Ashes on Ash Wednesday. Portions of their reporting have been cited directly, paraphrased and incorporated alongside my own research, analysis, commentary, and additional sources. I encourage readers to read the original article here.

This is a real image of children starving during the Holodomor of 1932-33 in a man-made famine under the butcher Stalin and the Judeo-Bolshevik, Lazar Kaganovich.

These children did not starve because Ukraine suddenly forgot how to grow food. They starved while Stalin’s government was ripping apart the Ukrainian countryside through forced collectivization, confiscating grain and food from desperate families and brutally punishing people who resisted.

An estimated 6 million Ukrainian Orthodox Christians and Muslims died.

Ask yourself: why are you never taught about this in school?

The Ukrainians called this holocaust, the “Holodomor,” which means a “Famine-Genocide.”

Of course, the Zionists deny this. Just like they deny all of their numerous crimes against humanity. And we are watching the same fight over that word play out right now in Gaza. We are watching the death and destruction in 4K, right in front of our faces, while the Israeli government vehemently denies that what it is doing constitutes genocide.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

A MAN-MADE GENOCIDE

Stalin’s single most horrific campaign was the organized mass starvation of 1932-1933, when he weaponized hunger to crush peasant resistance to the forced collectivization of agriculture. Soviet military units swept through villages, confiscating grain and food, stripping people of the very things keeping them alive and condemning entire families to slowly starve to death.

And here is what makes this particularly sick: the people being starved were the farmers and villagers who produced the food. The very people growing the grain and working the land were forced to watch the food they produced be taken from them while their own families went hungry.

In the case of the Holodomor, this was the first genocide that was methodically planned out and perpetrated by depriving the very people who were producers of food of their nourishment (for survival). What is especially horrific is that the withholding of food was used as a weapon of genocide and that it was done in a region of the world known as the ‘breadbasket of Europe’.

-Prof. Andrea Graziosi, University of Naples

The primary victims of the Holodomor, literally meaning “death inflicted by starvation,” were rural farmers and villagers, who made up roughly 80 percent of Ukraine’s population in the 1930s.

This is perhaps the only case in history of a purely man-made famine.

This was starvation being used as a weapon. Food existed. The government took it. People resisted. They were punished. Millions died.

The horror of the Holodomor is that simple.

THE JUDEO-BOLSHEVIKS WHO PLOTTED THE UKRAINIAN HOLOCAUST

1) Lazar Kaganovich: Stalin’s political figurehead of the Central Committee. In 1928, Kaganovich led the implementation in the Ukraine of Stalin’s first Five-Year Plan.

~ The aim of Stalin’s first Five-Year Plan in the Ukraine was to destroy family farms through starvation making the peasants “landless” and thereby introducing “collectivization” by which the Ukrainian peasants were forced to become employees of the state. This forced-famine reached its crises point in 1932.

2) Genrikh Yagoda: Founder of the NKVD (Soviet Secret Police). Assisted in the first Five-Year Plan of starving Ukrainian peasants.

3) Nikolai Yezhov: Appointed by Yagoda as Head of the NKVD. Assisted in the first Five-Year Plan of starving Ukrainian peasants. Yezhov took on a “Russian” name like most Judeo-Bolsheviks. His wife was an active Jew.

These Judeo-Bolsheviks seized livestock, crops, grain, and farm instruments from the Ukrainian peasants. Any Ukrainian citizen who resisted them was shot. Desperate Ukrainian clergy and peasants ate anything to survive: bugs, grass, and leather shoes.

Judeo-Bolsheviks were the chief architects of the Ukrainian forced-famine which eliminated Ukrainian clergy and 6 million Ukrainian Orthodox Christians.

Anybody who claims the Holodomor was not perpetrated by Jews is ~15% correct and about ~85% wrong.

85% of Bolshevik leaders were Jewish.
92% of the Gulag commanders were Jewish.
50% of the NKVD Generals were Jewish.

The mass murder of at least 60 million orthodox Christians and Muslims in the USSR was committed by a majority Jewish government.

The Bolsheviks killed over 60 million people and you never once heard about it in school. Why?

Because the people who committed these crimes against humanity (Zionists) are now in control of our education system. For example, Robert Maxwell, father of Ghislaine Maxwell, was the owner of one of the largest textbook publishers in the United States (Macmillan and McGraw-Hill).

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

THE ADL DOWNPLAYS THE HOLODOMOR

Abe Foxman, who headed the ADL for nearly three decades and became one of Israel’s most prominent defenders in the United States, met with Ukrainian officials and issued a remarkable warning: do not compare the Holodomor to the Holocaust.

But one thing that you need to be sensitive about is not to link it (the Holodomor) with the Holocaust. Be careful that it is not linked as your genocide and our genocide, because that would be counter productive.

-Abe Foxman

Counterproductive to what, exactly? That is the obvious question. Why would recognizing the suffering and death of millions of Ukrainians somehow become “counterproductive” to Israel?

Quite an admission, because Foxman’s warning makes one thing particularly clear: Israel views the Holocaust as political in nature.

If you haven't read my exposé on the ADL yet, please do. I go deep into the satanic origins of the organization and the truly disturbing history surrounding it.

By the 1980s, the ADL’s main purpose was no longer to try to stop antisemitism but instead to discredit any voice that was hostile to the policies of Israel.

And lately, I’ve been getting a taste of that myself.

The more I write about the Bolsheviks and question the history we’ve been taught about World War Two, the uglier this gets. The attacks against me have ramped up considerably and there are now people openly trying to mass report my work and contacting Substack in an effort to have my entire account deleted.

I knew when I started writing about this that people were going to come after me. Disagreeing with me is fine. I actually welcome a healthy debate. Tell me I’m wrong. Challenge my sources. Make your argument.

But trying to get my account deleted because you don’t like what I’m writing? Trying to make sure I’m not allowed to write at all?

That’s absolutely crazy.

Since when did disagreeing with somebody mean they shouldn’t be allowed to speak? Whatever happened to the First Amendment?

So I’m asking you for a favor. If you value the work I’m doing here, please help me make sure it reaches more people. Share my profile, send one of my investigations to someone you think needs to read it, or simply pass my work along.

If there are people working this hard to make sure nobody sees what I’m writing, then the best response is to make damn sure even more people see it.

And if you’re in a position to support my work financially, you can do that below. I spend an enormous amount of time digging through documents, archives and sources for these investigations, and your support is what allows me to keep doing it.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Source

“Not everything is fake!”
“You’re so negative!”
“How dare you? Children are dead. Have some respect!”

I can already hear it.

These are the responses you’re almost guaranteed to get the second you question the official story surrounding an emotionally charged, heavily publicized media event. You’re not supposed to examine it too closely. You’re supposed to feel something immediately, pick a side, and react.

That is precisely why emotion is so powerful in propaganda and psychological operations. If you can get people angry enough, terrified enough, or heartbroken enough, you can make questioning the story itself feel immoral.

And there is almost nothing more emotionally devastating than the death of a child.

I’m not here to tell you what to believe about this case. I’m going to lay out the facts and inconsistencies that I find extremely suspicious, and you can decide for yourself what they mean.

I’m not telling you what to think, I’m just asking you to think.

But before we get into them, there’s an obvious question that needs to be addressed: Why would anyone fake or manufacture a highly publicized trial in the first place?

My answer is simple: to attack the family unit through division and distrust, while feeding the kind of mass outrage that drives people further apart.

Divide and conquer is one of the oldest strategies in the book. The only thing that changes is how it is packaged.

Keep this question in mind as you read through this: could Lindsay and Patrick Clancy be crisis actors?

The Official Script: Emphasis on ‘Script’?

On January 24, 2023, Patrick Clancy was reportedly gone from the family’s Duxbury home for less than an hour, picking up food and a prescription. Prosecutors allege that during that incredibly narrow window, Lindsay Clancy heard a voice telling her to kill her children, brought all three of them into the basement, strangled them with exercise resistance bands, cut her own wrists and neck, then went upstairs and jumped from a window.

She survived the fall but was allegedly left paralyzed.

If the intention was suicide, why choose a fall from a height that could very realistically leave you injured rather than dead?

Because you don’t need to be thinking particularly clearly to recognize that jumping from that height is not going to kill you.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Let’s talk about the near-identical case that happened in Ireland on the same exact date just 3 years prior.

Here’s the facts of each case…

Ireland: Deirdre Morley, January 24th, 2020.

• Age: 43

• Nurse

• 3 children

• 2 boys, 1 girl

• Children’s initials: Conor, Darragh, Carla (CDC)

• Killed all 3 children inside the family home

• Children were strangled/suffocated

• Husband was away from home as it happened

• Found outside after an apparent suicide attempt

• Had a severe psychotic depressive illness

• Sought psychiatric help before the deaths

• Found not guilty by reason of insanity

United States: Lindsay Clancy, January 24th, 2023.

• Age: 32

• Nurse

• 3 children

• 2 boys, 1 girl

• Children’s initials: Cora, Dawson, Callan (CDC)

• Killed all 3 children inside the family home

• Children were strangled/suffocated

• Husband was away from home as it happened

• Found outside after an apparent suicide attempt

• Had a severe psychotic depressive illness

• Documented psychiatric struggles before the deaths

• Sought psychiatric help before the deaths

• Found not guilty by reason of insanity

The only difference between these cases is their age. I mean seriously, what are the chances?

The ‘Trial’

They displayed “Abracadabra. It’s magic!” during the Clancy trial for everyone to see. Because it’s all an illusion, a theatrical performance, stagecraft. They always tell you.

Look at these photographs and forget, for a moment, what the media has already told you that you’re supposed to see. Actually look at her.

Does this look like a woman who methodically strangled her three young children to death?

Every single day of this trial, her hair was styled and her makeup was done.

As we discussed previously, Clancy was allegedly a nurse. A nurse who, for some reason, thought it was a great idea to go on ten different psychiatric drugs.

And apparently, we’re supposed to believe her doctors thought this was perfectly reasonable.

This is where the official story completely loses me. If this case happened exactly the way we are being told it happened, Clancy would not have been the only person facing charges. The doctors responsible for prescribing and managing that insane cocktail of psychiatric drugs would have been facing criminal charges too.

And I’m not talking about some malpractice lawsuit quietly settled behind closed doors. I’m talking about actual criminal charges.

But then again, nothing ever seems to make sense when the CIA is the one writing the script.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

The Children…

I’m probably going to piss off a lot of people with this part, and frankly, that reaction is exactly why cases involving children are so effective as psychological operations.

Question any other case and people will hear you out. Question a case where three children allegedly died and suddenly the conversation is over before it even begins. You’re heartless. You’re sick. You’re a psychopath. How dare you even ask?

But did these children really die? Did they even exist as they have been presented to us? I don’t know. Neither do you. We know what we have been shown and what we have been told. And since when do we believe anything the mainstream media shows us?

So put the horror of the allegations aside and actually use your own eyes.

Look at the two photographs.

In the photograph on the left, both of the older children appear to have noticeable dimples. In the photograph on the right, where did they go?

Now focus on the older kids. To me, both appear to be more mature in the image on the left than they do on the right. Specifically, the girl’s face looks older and more mature on the left. And typically, younger kids lose weight as they age, but the boy looks to have more baby weight on the right.

This doesn’t add up to me, because the baby is obviously younger on the left, so the older children should be younger as well.

Now look at the little girl. Her hair appears significantly darker in one photograph than the other. Are we supposed to believe a child that young was having her hair dyed?

Frankly, the photograph on the right looks AI-generated or heavily manipulated to me.

Now look at the youngest child in the two images below.

Put your emotions aside for thirty seconds and compare the photographs carefully.

Look at the eyebrows and the eyes. Look at the hairline. Look at the facial proportions.

To my eyes, these look like two entirely different children.

The Husband’s Alleged New Wife

And then we get to Patrick’s new wife, Rachel, and this is where the family connections become impossible for me to simply gloss over.

Rachel is reportedly the daughter of Roy Danis, a longtime wine and spirits executive who spent 17 years working at Seagram. Yes, that Seagram. The Bronfman family liquor empire whose name would later become inseparable from the NXIVM sex trafficking cult scandal.

But here’s where it gets even stranger.

Roy Danis’s connection to the Bronfmans apparently didn’t end when he left Seagram.

Today, Danis is in business with former Seagram CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr. through Revival Spirits.

The Bronfmans are a billionaire dynasty. We are talking about the elite of the elite here. These are not people who casually go into business with just anybody.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Ok, So Maybe This Case Doesn’t Make Sense. But Why Would They Lie About Something Like This?

Let’s work through another thought experiment and actually think about this logically.

Let’s assume for a minute that the case happened exactly as we’ve been told. Every detail is true. What message does a story like this send to both men and women?

If you’re a man watching this case unfold, you’re being shown that the sweet, loving woman you marry and trust enough to have children with could suddenly become a homicidal maniac and butcher those children while you’re gone picking up dinner.

What the hell is a man supposed to take away from that? Simple. Don’t get married. Don’t have children.

And where does that conclusion lead?

Once again: don’t marry her. Don’t have children with her.

Then comes the second poison pill: maybe women really are that unstable. Maybe they’re governed entirely by hormones and emotions that an otherwise loving mother can turn into somebody capable of murdering her own children. Maybe no matter how normal your wife appears, you can never completely trust her.

And if you actually believed that about women, why would you marry one? Why would you have children with one?

Now flip it around and look at the message a woman could absorb from the exact same story.

You can be educated. You can have a successful career. You can marry a man you love and have three beautiful children. You can build the life women are told they’re supposed to want.

And then motherhood can completely destroy you.

Your pregnancy can supposedly wreck your hormones. Postpartum depression can swallow you alive. The doctors can pump you full of psychiatric drugs. Your husband can leave the house for less than an hour, and apparently that is all it takes for your entire life to end in absolute horror.

So what the hell is a young woman supposed to take away from that?

Maybe pregnancy isn’t worth the risk. Maybe motherhood is dangerous.

And if you actually believed motherhood could do that to you, why would you have children?

That’s what makes the messaging so corrosive. Men can walk away terrified of women, while women can walk away terrified of motherhood itself.

You don’t need somebody sitting on television explicitly telling men and women to stop getting married and having children when you can scare the absolute shit out of them until they reach that conclusion themselves.

Destroy trust between people and you don’t have to physically destroy the community. People will withdraw from one another themselves.

And before somebody tells me intelligence agencies would never deliberately destabilize a community, go crack open a history.

Human beings are much easier to manipulate when they’re isolated. They don’t want you surrounded by people you trust more than institutions. They don’t want strong families and communities capable of taking care of their own.

They want you alone, suspicious of everybody around you and dependent on them.

The Psychological Operation

I cannot tell you for certain what took place here, or if anything even happened at all. My intention is never to speak with absolute certainty.

All I’m trying to do is open your eyes to a reality that most people would rather not confront: social engineers and intelligence agencies do not give a shit about us. In fact, they hate us. The government views you and me as sheep. They use stories like this to exploit our emotions, manipulate the public and redirect our time and attention toward whatever outcome benefits them and ultimately harms us.

They lie constantly. About things large and small. About everything. No lie is too big to tell and they do not care how many thousands or millions of people are harmed in the process.

Nothing should ever be off limits from questioning because somebody decided the subject was too offensive or too painful to touch. That is exactly when you should be paying closer attention. The second people can shut down legitimate questions by making you feel ashamed for asking them, they don’t have to prove a damn thing. They just have to make questioning it socially unacceptable.

We have a century of documented propaganda, psychological operations and intelligence agencies lying directly to the public. After everything that has been exposed, I cannot understand why anyone still believes there are certain stories these people simply wouldn’t manipulate because surely that would be going too far.

What exactly is “too far” for people who have already demonstrated that they’re willing to lie to you about anything? That they’re willing to kill people en masse? At what point in history did these institutions earn the benefit of the doubt we keep handing them?

So when a story suddenly has the entire country furious, terrified or emotionally invested, I pay attention to more than the story itself. I want to know who is driving the conversation, what they want the public demanding by the end of it, and who walks away benefiting from all that outrage.

I’m not even asking you to believe me when I tell you there are things about this case that don’t make sense.

I’m asking you to start looking at the world stage for what it is: a performance.

We are constantly watching people play their assigned parts, narratives take shape in real time and millions of people suddenly become consumed by the exact same story at the exact same moment.

Stop outsourcing your judgment to TikTok influencers and political pundits whose livelihoods depend on keeping you angry enough to click on the next video. Half of these people are racing each other to make the most outrageous viral claim before they’ve even bothered to figure out whether it’s true.

Look at the evidence yourself. Read the documents yourself. Follow the connections yourself. And for the love of God, stop allowing strangers on the internet to decide what you’re permitted to question.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Trigger warning: extremely disturbing content.

Before I get into what I’ve uncovered in the Epstein files, I want to remind everyone of something that happened when these files first started coming out.

Political commentators actually began arguing over whether Jeffrey Epstein should even be called a pedophile because, according to them, he was interested in 15-year-old girls, not little kids.

Yes, this was a real conversation people were having.

Here’s one of those moments:

I know somebody very close to this case... Jeffrey Epstein, in this person’s view, was not a pedophile... He was into the barely legal type. Like he liked 15 year old girls. He wasn’t into like 8 year olds...There’s a difference between a 15 year old and a 5 year old.

-Megyn Kelly

Megyn Kelly has three teenage children herself, which makes hearing something like that come out of her mouth even more disturbing.

But she certainly wasn’t alone. This argument spread all over social media after the files came out. People were seriously trying to draw some comforting little line around Epstein’s crimes because the girls he was accused of abusing were supposedly teenagers rather than young children.

I want to make myself extremely clear here because I am sick of watching adults play these disgusting semantic games when children are involved.

Who writes the laws defining who is a ‘pedophile’ and who is not? Oh, that’s right. The pedophiles in power. And who has bene trying to lower the age of consent in multiple states around this country and in multiple countries all over the world? Oh, that’s right. Pedophiles.

Frankly, I do not give a damn what anyone in power wants to call it when they are trying to minimize the sexual abuse of a 15-year-old.

A 15-YEAR-OLD IS STILL A CHILD.

You can dress it up in clinical terminology. You can hide behind diagnostic definitions. You can call her “barely legal” to make yourself feel better about what happened. I don’t care.

If you are a grown adult sexually abusing a child, I’m going to call you exactly what I believe you are: a pedophile.

Now that I’ve gotten that out of the way, let’s get into what I actually uncovered in the Epstein files.

If you appreciate the endless hours I’ve dedicated to reading and reporting on the Epstein files and you want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Cannibalism and the Presidents…

There is an FBI document in the Epstein files containing allegations from a man who described encounters with Jeffrey Epstein that he said began when he was approximately four years old.

According to his account, he first encountered Epstein in East Greenwich, Rhode Island.

He alleged that his great-uncle raped him when he was a child and that Jeffrey Epstein was present.

But what he told the FBI gets considerably more disturbing from there.

The man stated that when he was approximately eight years old, he was aboard a large luxury ship where he was subjected to what he described as some type of “medical” examination. He alleged that a tape measure was inserted into his rectum before he was raped (sodomized) while in what he described as a “heavy drug-induced state.”

He identified the perpetrators as Jeffrey Epstein and former President Bill Clinton.

And those were nowhere near the most horrifying allegations contained in his account.

The man claimed that several infants were killed aboard the vessel and that their intestines were removed. He also described acts of cannibalism.

He further alleged that former President George H.W. Bush engaged in a sex act with an unidentified man, and claimed that former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and George Soros were aboard the same vessel while these events were occurring.

Then comes perhaps the most consequential part of his statement.

According to the man, evidence of these crimes existed on multiple “snuff films.”

If you haven’t read my expose on the Dutroix Dossier I highly recommend you do so, it describes in details the various ways these “snuff films” are used.

Oh, and here’s a video of Bill Clinton during the Epstein deposition where he smiles and nods while flipping through old photos…until his attorney quickly snatches them away.

If you appreciate the endless hours I’ve dedicated to reading and reporting on the Epstein files and you want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Child Sexual Abuse Material In The Epstein Files

Jeffrey Epstein was sent an email that allegedly contained a child sexual abuse image depicting an 11-year-old child.

So I have a very obvious question: Why is the name of the person who sent it to him redacted?

Look at the image below. On that same day, what appears to be the same sender sent Epstein another image titled “Age 10.”

I say appears to be the same sender because, once again, the name has been redacted.

And these are not supposed to be the kinds of names hidden from the public. So why is this person being protected behind a black box?

Who was sending Jeffrey Epstein images of children? Are they still alive? Are they still sending images of children to people? Are they committing crimes against children right now while their identity sits safely behind a government redaction? Were they ever investigated?

And let’s not forget when this happened: 2016.

By then, Jeffrey Epstein was already a convicted pedophile.

I’d love to know what you all make of this…because I find it disturbing, to say the absolute least.

As you’ve seen in my previous reporting, none of this information is new. The political elite have long been known to engage in acts of satanic ritual abuse, pedophilia, and cannibalism. You can find some relevant articles below.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Jolly West, a doctor and MKUltra contractor, reported in 1956 that, through the use of LSD and other drugs, he could “speed the induction of the hypnotic state and deepen the trance,” after which he could replace “true memories” with “false ones” in people’s minds without them knowing it.

Two years earlier, a 34-year-old Air Force sergeant with no history of violent or criminal behavior murdered a three-year-old girl in an apparent trance state. Dr. West was assigned to be the man’s psychiatric expert.

It turned out that the sergeant had been, ostensibly, undergoing an experimental treatment for his migraine headaches at the base.

In another case, the son of Andrija Puharich — an American physician, scientist, and inventor who used teenagers in his psychic experiments — gave documentary filmmaker Greg Mallozzi access to his father’s archive, which includes numerous recordings.

In one of these recordings Puharich says:

I worked as a consultant to the CIA. My boss was the chief medical director who’s in charge of all the dirty tricks stuff when it came to drugs and hypnosis and all the mind manipulation stuff.

Toward the end of his life, Puharich became a whistleblower and publicly lectured about the dangers of the experiments and the US government’s role.

And just as a sidenote, I always find it interesting how often people suddenly become CIA “whistleblowers” toward the end of their lives, when there’s little left for them to lose. Where was that courage when they were still collecting a paycheck and helping the government carry out utterly despicable crimes against humanity? It’s remarkable how the conscience seems to kick in after the careers are over, the money has been made, and other human beings have already paid the price through torture, suffering, and death.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Anyways, a 1957 FBI memo reported that Puharich:

Uses various electronic equipment and drugs in his experiments and appears to be dedicated to the study of the science of transmitting messages from one person to another through mental telepathy.

The memo notes that Puharich served in the Army Medical Corps at the Army Chemical Center at Edgewood, Maryland, the installation at the center of the military’s early LSD work.

Puharich’s work, which covered both drugs and psychic phenomena, may have bridged two separate government programs, MKUltra and the Stargate Project, which investigated the use of extrasensory perception (ESP) and psychokinesis from 1972 to 1995.

Former President Jimmy Carter revealed that the CIA had, on at least one occasion in the late 1970s, effectively used a psychic:

We had a plane go down in the Central African Republic — a twin-engine plane, a small plane. And we couldn’t find it. The director of the CIA came and told me that he had contacted a woman in California who claimed to have supernatural capabilities. And she went into a trance, and she wrote down latitudes and longitudes, and we sent our satellite over that latitude and longitude, and there was the plane.

I’d love to hear what you all think about this. I know this article is shorter than what I usually publish, but I want to start sharing more of the documents I come across while I’m deep-diving into mind control programs, intelligence agencies, and the people connected to them.

So let me know in the comments: Have you ever heard of the Stargate Project, Andrija Puharich, or Dr. Jolly West? Have you come across any documents, names, programs, or connections you think I should look into?

Could these mind control programs be the reason why a seemingly normal individual, with no history of violent behavior, could randomly shoot up a school or blow up a building?

How many of the so-called “lone killers” we’ve been told acted entirely on their own were actually the result of a government mind control program?

Send me down the rabbit hole. I’ll keep digging through the records and report back on what I find.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

SOURCE

Gloria Steinem, the woman many credit as the “Founder of Feminism,” died on September 2, 2026.

And I’m already seeing the tributes pour in about what a “trailblazing feminist” she was and everything she supposedly did for women around the world.

Funny how so many of those tributes are leaving out her relationship with what I consider to be the largest terrorist organization in the world: the CIA.

Steinem called the CIA “nonviolent,” “liberal,” and “honorable.” She never apologized for her association with them and said she would do it again. The same CIA that overthrew governments, propped up dictators, murdered dissidents, conducted drug experiments on children, and aligned itself with the most oppressive regimes in the world. Its interventions led to severe and systematic repression of women in countries all around the world, while CIA personnel themselves used sexual violence as a method of coercion. Within the CIA’s own ranks, women faced rampant sexual harassment. And the agency itself systematically discriminated against women.

…but sure, tell me again about Gloria Steinem, the trailblazing feminist who stood up for women around the world.

Seems like a pretty important contradiction to leave out of all these glowing tributes.

So I’m here to fill in the holes.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Steinem and the CIA

Nobody with the interests of society at heart would be trying to divide men and women against each other. There is nothing more important to the foundation of a society than the family unit.

Steinem was recruited into the CIA by officers C.D. Jackson and Cord Meyer. She then “founded” and “directed” the Independent Research Service,  a CIA front organization used to send American students to the 1959 World Youth Festival in Vienna and the 1962 Helsinki festival during the Cold War.

And the CIA wasn’t some distant connection quietly lurking in the background. Her operation was funded almost entirely by the agency, including approximately $85,000 for Vienna alone. Steinem ran the organization from 1959 to 1962 and remained on its board as late as 1969.

Then, in a 1967 interview, Steinem admitted that she knew exactly who was backing the surveillance operation: the CIA.

And instead of that relationship destroying her credibility or sending her career into obscurity like you might expect, the exact opposite happened.

Gloria Steinem’s career exploded.

One year after the CIA revelations became public, Steinem was suddenly propelled into national prominence. Clay Felker, the publisher of New York Magazine, backed her rise and later helped launch Ms. Magazine in 1971.

And then the money started pouring in.

One of the major early investors was Katharine Graham, the owner of The Washington Post and Newsweek, who put up $20,000 before the magazine had even launched.

Years later, while giving a speech at CIA headquarters in 1988, Graham made this infamous statement about government secrecy and the role of the press:

We live in a dirty and dangerous world. There are some things the general public does not need to know, and shouldn't. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows.

—Katharine Graham, “Secrecy and the Press,” delivered at CIA headquarters to new recruits

Think about how extraordinary that is coming from one of the most powerful media figures in America. Katharine Graham owned The Washington Post and Newsweek, helped bankroll Steinem’s “feminist” magazine, and then stood inside CIA headquarters openly defending the idea that there were things the American public “does not need to know” and that the press could decide to keep what it knows from us.

And by “the press could decide,” she’s talking about the very journalists working hand-in-hand with the CIA under Operation Mockingbird.

And this was one of the women helping finance Gloria Steinem.

Then came Warner Communications, which poured nearly $1 million into Ms. Magazine while taking only 25% of the stock. By normal media investment standards, this was an incredibly bizarre deal. And wouldn’t you know it, Warner also happened to own Wonder Woman comics, which Ms. Magazine would go on to aggressively promote.

CIA money. Media money. Corporate money. All flowing through the same increasingly interconnected circle around America’s shiny new feminist icon.

With corporate money and the backing of some of the most powerful people in American media, Ms. Magazine became the face of mainstream feminism.

This is why Ms. Magazine never challenged U.S. foreign policy or the CIA, an agency with a documented history of committing some of the most horrific abuses against human beings, especially women and children, around the world.

And it’s also why, despite Steinem’s history with that agency, she was allowed to remain a celebrated feminist icon instead of being confronted for what she was: an operative whose career aligned perfectly with U.S. geopolitical interests, while selling out the very women she claimed to represent.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Steinem and Stanley Pottinger

For ten years, Gloria Steinem was in a relationship with Stanley Pottinger while he was running guns during the Iran-Contra affair along with Jeffrey Epstein himself.

Ah, yes. What a staunch defender of women, running in the same circles as a pedophile and trafficker of women and young girls.

Steinem and Israel

Steinem was also a committed Zionist who consistently defended Israeli aggression.

In 1975, women from countries all over the world condemned Zionism at the UN’s first World Conference on Women in Mexico City. And what did this supposed champion of women do? She went after the women.

Steinem spent her career telling women they deserved a voice, but when women used that voice to condemn Israel, suddenly she had a problem with it.

And this is something people desperately need to understand about so many of these public figures: they don’t actually believe the shit they preach to you. Their morals are for sale. Their principles last exactly as long as their donors allow them to. They’ll protect the “right” people, abandon everything they supposedly stand for, and then get back in front of a camera and sell you the same carefully manufactured BS image all over again.

Steinem, just like the Zionists today, subordinated everything she professed to believe (the agency of women) in order to uphold the genocidal Jewish State of Israel.

We’re watching people do this exact same thing right now.

There are people who have spent their entire careers screaming about being “pro-life” who will turn around and staunchly defend Israel while thousands of children are being killed in the genocide in Gaza.

Tell me, did you know about Steinem’s connections to the CIA?

And who else spent years building a public image while quietly working with the CIA behind the scenes? How many people have we been told were independent journalists or activists, only to find out later that the CIA was somewhere in the background?

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Why is everyone so shocked that child trafficking is rampant in Hollywood? I mean, they’ve been showing us this stuff in kids’ movies for decades.

Investigations done by the FBI have shown that pedophiles will use specific symbols to indicate their sexual preferences and to ‘tag’ people.

And once you know what you’re looking for, it becomes pretty hard to ignore.

Throughout this article, I’m going to break down those symbols, show you what the FBI actually documented, and then show you where the same or strikingly similar symbols have appeared in children’s movies and toys, international logos, and other places you probably never thought twice about.

I’m not asking you to take my word for anything. Look at the documents. Look at the images. Decide for yourself whether what you’re seeing is coincidence.

And while you’re looking, keep this quote in the back of your mind:

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

Pedophile Symbols In Children’s Movies

Pedophiles, to include those who sexually abuse children as well as those who produce, distribute, and trade child pornography, are using various types of identification logos or symbols to recognize one another and distinguish their sexual preferences. To specifically indicate the pedophile’s gender preference, members of pedophilic organizations encourage the use of descriptions such as “boylove,” “girllove,” and “childlove.” These symbols have been etched into rings and formed into pendants, and have also been found imprinted on coins.

-FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN

The BoyLover logo (BLogo) is a small blue spiral-shaped triangle surrounded by a larger triangle, whereby the small triangle represents a small boy and the larger triangle represents an adult man.

A variation of the BLogo is the Little Boy Lover logo (LBLogo), which also embodies a small spiral-shaped triangle within a larger triangle; however, the corners of the LBLogo are rounded to resemble a scribbling by a young child. Images of the BLogo and LBLogo symbols are depicted below.

Now here’s the ‘BLogo’ aka “Boy Lover” logo in Elena of Avalor, a children’s movie…

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Here’s the ‘LBLogo’ aka “Little Boy Lover” in that same movie…

Here’s the ‘LBLogo’ aka “Little Boy Lover” logo in Hercules…

You’ll find the ‘LBLogo’ aka “Little Boy Lover” logo all throughout the movie Moana, including in the title…

The ‘LBLogo’ aka “Little Boy Lover” logo in Blues Clues…

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

The ‘LBLogo’ aka “Little Boy Lover” logo in Pinocchio, during the boys arrival to “Pleasure Island"…

You’ll find the symbol to the left of the characters nose.

The ‘BLogo’ aka “Boy Lover” logo in Flight of the Navigator, a Disney Movie. The symbol is found on the stairs, leading to the ship…

The ‘LBLogo’ aka “Little Boy Lover” logo on Huggies diapers…

The ‘BLogo’ aka “Boy Lover” logo on Disney’s The Jungle Book merchandise…

The ‘LBLogo’ aka “Little Boy Lover” and ‘BLogo’ aka “Boy Lover” logo in The Adventures of Pan…

‘GLogo’ aka “GirlLover” Logo

A small heart surrounded by a larger hear, which symbolizes a relationship between an adult male or female and minor girl. Depicted below.

The ‘GLogo’ aka “GirlLover” Logo on a children’s toy…

The ‘GLogo’ aka “GirlLover” Logo as the Heartbrand logo, an international ice cream brand…

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

The ‘GLogo’ aka “GirlLover” Logo in Powderpuff Girls…

Pedophile Symbols Are All Around Us

In Kohl’s…

The ‘LBLogo’ aka “Little Boy Lover” logo on a large record label…

The ‘LBLogo’ aka “Little Boy Lover” logo at Voodoo Donuts…

I didn’t include these symbols but wanted to make sure you’re aware of these two as well.

The ‘CLogo’ aka “ChildLover,” as shown below, resembles a butterfly and represents non-preferential gender child abusers. The ‘CLOMAL’ aka “Childlove Online Media Activism” Logo, also represented below, is a general purpose logo used by individuals who use online media such as blogs and webcasts.

So, I know what I believe, but what do you think? Purely coincidence?
And where else have you seen these symbols?

Let me know in the comments…

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

There are over 1,000 mentions of Disney in the Epstein files, and buried among them is an email where Jeffrey Epstein, in his own words, claimed he had “special access” to Disney.

Why a corporation whose entire empire is largely centered around CHILDREN would give any kind of “special access” to a convicted pedophile is beyond me. But honestly, when you look at the people Epstein surrounded himself with, and then start digging into the child trafficking scandals that have involved people connected to Disney, I’m not surprised anymore.

What I want to know is what did Epstein mean by “special access.” Access to what? Access to whom? And why did Jeffrey Epstein have it in the first place?

Let’s not forget that Dick Cook, a former executive at Walt Disney went on the Lolita Express (Epstein’s private plane).

So, could Disney have been a playground for Epstein and the people in his orbit?

Trafficking Scandals Surrounding Disney

In April of this year, a Disney cruise ship was raided as part of a massive child exploitation investigation, and 10 Disney employees were arrested.

But that case is far from the only one.

In 2022, 108 people were arrested during a six-day undercover human trafficking operation in Florida targeting alleged child sexual predators and people seeking prostitution.

Among those taken into custody were four Disney employees and a retired judge, police said.

But I’m sure that was just a coincidence, right?

2021: a couple filed a $20 million lawsuit alleging their 3-year-old daughter was sexually assaulted on a Disney Cruise Line ship.

2019: Keith Seitz, a 53-year-old Disney Cruise Line worker, was arrested and charged in Florida for repeatedly raping a 13-year-old girl.

2013: Disney Cruise Line delayed reporting the sexual molestation of an 11-year-old girl aboard the Disney Dream.

In fact, this has happened so many times that when the news decides to report on it, they literally say “another Disney Cruise Line worker arrested…”

But there’s no way that a company with ties to Epstein could possibly be running some kind of child trafficking ring, right? We’re expected to believe that every single one of these connections is just another completely unrelated coincidence, right?

Another interesting little detail: cruise lines are not legally required to publicly disclose every disappearance that happens aboard their ships.

Which seems completely backwards, right?

You would think that if cruise lines knew the public was going to see exactly how many people disappeared from their ships, where it happened, and what the circumstances were, there would be a lot more pressure to prevent people from disappearing in the first place.

Instead, the public is left knowing remarkably little about all the nefarious things taking place aboard cruise ships.

It’s the Epstein Network’s world, and apparently we’re just living in it.

If you appreciate the endless hours I’ve dedicated to reading and reporting on the Epstein files and you want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Disney Cruise Snorkeling Around Epstein’s Island

Here’s where things get even more interesting. Most major cruise lines, including Disney Cruise Line, stop in St. Thomas, which is just a mile from Jeffrey Epstein’s private island.

And when these cruise ships dock in St. Thomas, passengers can book all kinds of excursions that take them out onto the surrounding water and islands. Snorkeling excursions are one of the most popular.

One of those excursions is called “Captain Nautica’s Snorkeling Expedition.”

And guess where that name shows up?

In the Epstein files.

And this isn’t some company that disappeared decades ago. The excursion is still operating and available to tourists today.

So now we have a snorkeling excursion operating out of the same area as Epstein’s island, marketed to cruise passengers, including Disney passengers, and the company’s name appears in the Epstein files.

Why are we having families snorkel around Epstein’s island?

And remember, there’s a trapdoor on Epstein’s island that led directly to the sea from under the house…but I’m sure that’s just another coincidence.

Disney Movie '“Enchanted”

There’s a scene in the Disney movie Enchanted that includes a reference to “Epstein’s Books.”

Okay, weird coincidence, right?

Except Barry Josephson, the Hollywood producer behind Enchanted, also had ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

In 2011, Jeffrey Epstein was looking for an assistant and reached out to Josephson asking if he knew any “amazing women” in their early 20s who might want to work for him.

Josephson responded:

“I have ‘the’ girl. Her name is [redacted]. She worked for me on two films. Young, attractive, insane rack, smart, although not a genius, but very efficient, will do anything, and tight lipped period end of story.”

But I’m sure it’s just another completely innocent coincidence that the guy recommending young women in their early 20s to Jeffrey Epstein, using language like “will do anything” and “tight lipped,” also had the name Epstein planted right there in his Disney movie.

If you appreciate the endless hours I’ve dedicated to reading and reporting on the Epstein files and you want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

The “Special Access” Email

On December 16, 2013, Jeffrey Epstein sent an email to physicist Lawrence Krauss stating that he had “special access” to Disney.

So, who exactly is Lawrence Krauss? And would you be surprised to learn that yet another professor in Epstein’s orbit would later face allegations of sexual misconduct?

The relationship between these two went back years.

In 2006, Krauss organized a conference funded by Epstein that included a trip to Epstein’s private island. The conference was supposedly about “Confronting Gravity.”

Krauss described it as an opportunity for attendees to:

meet, discuss, relax on the beach and take a trip to the nearby private island retreat of the science philanthropist Jeffrey Epstein, who funded the event.

“Science philanthropist Jeffrey Epstein.”

Certainly an interesting way to describe Jeffrey Epstein.

And their relationship didn’t end there. Between 2010 and 2017, Epstein donated $250,000 to a project Krauss ran at Arizona State University.

Then Lawrence Krauss himself faced multiple allegations of sexual misconduct.

And when the allegations began creating a public and media nightmare for him, who did Krauss turn to for advice?

Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

On August 24, 2017, Krauss reached out to Epstein:

can we talk tonight? I need advise.

Two hours later, he followed up again:

I have a question of some urgency.

So years after Epstein was already a convicted pedophile, Krauss was still apparently comfortable enough with him to reach out privately when he needed urgent advice about his own sexual misconduct controversy.

And this is the man Jeffrey Epstein was emailing when he claimed to have “special access” to Disney.

So, what do you think? Is Disney "the happiest place on earth" connected to the global child trafficking ring?

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Auschwitz is central to the Holocaust legend. If it can be proven that the official stories we have been told about Auschwitz are not true, the entire fabric of the Holocaust ultimately has to unravel.

So, let’s do some unraveling…

The three victor nations, Russia, America and Britain, collaborated together at Nuremberg to fabricate the horrorillusion, which would enable the US/UK to gain the post-war moral high ground, even after incinerating the German cities with two million tons of bombs. People were loath to believe that such a thing could have happened – until maybe after Iraq, when we saw how British-American intelligence had fabricated the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) lie without a tremor of conscience. Only then, I suggest, does it start to dawn upon the world that the notion of big human gas chambers was the original WMD hoax.

— Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom

RED CROSS VISITS WERE ROUTINE

We are told that Auschwitz was the deadliest of the German concentration camps. What almost nobody is encouraged to do, however, is actually go back and read the wartime records for themselves.

Because if this was encouraged, you would learn about the International Red Cross inspection teams that went to Auschwitz, speaking to prisoner representatives privately in order to hear firsthand accounts concerning mistreatment, interruptions of mail and parcel deliveries, health concerns, food and rationing, and conditions inside the camp.

In a 1650 page Red Cross report there was never a mention of gas chambers. Sort of seems like something that would’ve been mentioned if they truly existed, right?

Decades later, Ernst Zündel, a German-Canadian, was put on trial in Canada over his publications questioning the Holocaust. Yes, if you can believe it, the holocaust is so true that they had to make it illegal to question in 21 different countries.

Throughout Zündel’s trial, he forced the Red Cross to produce their WWII records and they showed approximately 270,000 total dead for all the camps.

There are documents from the Red Cross that explicitly stated the concentration camps were not used for extermination. They had detailed records of how many prisoners died and it was significantly lower than the famous “6 million.”

No such visits took place – ever! – to Soviet Gulag camps, which were primarily run by Jews…

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

A FACTUAL LIST OF FACILITIES AVAILABLE TO PRISONERS AT THE ALLEGED ‘DEATH CAMP’ OF AUSCHWITZ

Camp Dental Facilities

The photo below is taken from the Yad Vashem (Israel’s own “Holocaust memorial organization), showing prisoners at Auschwitz being treated in the ultra‐modern dental clinic at the camp. Note the striped clothes of the prisoners.

Before the war, 43% of Germany’s dentists were Jewish.

Camp Hospital

Used for the obvious purpose of treating the inmates’ health problems. Expert surgeons from the famous Berlin “Charité” Surgical Clinic were even dispatched to deal with difficult cases.

The photo below is of Block 10 at Auschwitz: the prisoner’s hospital block. Ironically, this hospital is directly in front of what is now claimed to be a “gas chamber.”

A look inside the Auschwitz prisoner’s hospital:
Nurses, doctors, prisoners, beds . . .

Why would they do all this if Auschwitz was “dedicated to killing everybody”?

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Camp Kitchen

One of the largest service buildings in Auschwitz with state-of-the-art cooking facilities. There were twelve of these throughout the camp.

The caloric content of the diet was carefully monitored by camp and Red Cross delegates. It only deteriorated in Auschwitz and other camps towards the end of the war when German railroads and the entire transport system collapsed under constant aerial attacks.

When the Nazis were not too busy murdering everybody, they also found time to build dining halls for the prisoners. Below, the dining hall at Auschwitz, where the big “gas chambers” were supposed to be.

Photograph from 1942.

Auschwitz also had its own greenhouse complex to provide food for the prisoners:

Camp Orchestras

There were six camp orchestras at Auschwitz/Birkenau alone, one of which contained no less than 100-120 musicians. The Jerusalem Post recorded one inmate’s memory, Professor Daniel K, who participated in the children’s choir at 10 years old, in 1943.

The Chorale (from Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony) was… performed by a Jewish children’s choir at Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1943… I was a member of that choir… I remember my first engagement with culture, with history, and with music – in the camp.

In March 1944, Daniel K. became severely ill with diphtheria and was transferred to the camp’s hospital barracks. His mother had asked to be transferred to stay with him in the hospital. After the war he recalled how:

One of the youth leaders of our group … asked to establish an education centre for children. He was given permission, and in a short time the education centre became a spiritual and social centre for the family camp. It was the soul of the camp. Musical and theatrical performances, including a children’s opera, were held at the centre. There were discussions of various ideologies – Zionism, Socialism, Czech nationalism… There was a conductor named Imré… (who) organized the children’s choir. Rehearsals were held in a huge washroom barracks where the acoustics were good…

The existence of orchestras, not only in Auschwitz but in all other camps, is confirmed by the Enzyklopaedie des Holocaust, p. 979.

Camp Theatre

On weekends at the camp cinema mainly cultural and non-political films were shown. One ex-occupant recalled how:

There was a library with newspapers. A violin quartet came to play in the barracks. They even ‘made a movie’ in the camp. Some evenings they brought in German movies…”

Theatrical performances, including a children’s opera, were held at the centre. The last pictures taken inside showed pianos and costumes and a stage where the inmates used to put on productions.

One ‘survivor’ recalls having been an orchestra musician:

A grand piano was brought into Block 1, and downstairs from it there was the Theatre. The inmates made a stage curtain. They staged plays which were ‘very peaceful,’ and some composed music.”

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Camp Library

Inmates could borrow books from forty-five thousand volumes available.

It was a large heated building with a library, storage, and offices on the main floor.

Camp Religious Facilities

Made available on a rotating basis to every denomination for religious services.

Camp Sport Facilities

Soccer fields, handball areas, fencing classes and other exercise facilities.

There were prisoners from all over the world at Auschwitz, not just Jews. The camp had originally been built to accommodate Polish Prisoners of War and later had many Russian POWS arrive as well. Below, the British POW soccer team at Auschwitz pose for their group photograph.

Camp Swimming Pool

A camp swimming pool for use by the inmates on Birkenallee where there were walkways with comfortable benches for inmates to relax in the shade of the trees.

In 1947 a Jewish Auschwitz survivor stated Auschwitz had a swimming pool:

The working hours were modified on Sundays and holidays, when most of the kommandos were at leisure. Roll call was at around noon; evenings were devoted to rest and to a choice of cultural and sporting activities. Football, basketball, and water-polo matches (in an open-air pool built within the perimeter by detainees) attracted crowds of onlookers.

—Marc Klein

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Camp Post Office

Letters to and from the outside world were collected twice weekly. One postcard sent from Auschwitz dated 18 February 1942 by Johann Klausa expressed the hope that his family is in good health and that they will write to him – he was eventually released from the camp on 27 November 1943. Considering that Klausa arrived in the camp on 25 June 1940, he sounds rather cheerful!

If you are gassing people, do you let them write letters?

Camp Maternity Ward

Over 3,000 live births were registered there with not a single infant death while Auschwitz was in operation under German rule.

It was a regular occurrence for children to be born in the camp. Between breaks from exterminating everyone, they even set up a nursery for the children.

Most of these facilities can still be seen in the camp today, including the cinema, swimming pool, hospital, library and post office.

Let us hope the schoolchildren visitors are properly taught about the elegant swimming-pool at Auschwitz, built by the inmates, who would sunbathe there on Saturday and Sunday afternoons while watching the water-polo matches; and shown the paintings from its art class, which still exist; and told about the camp library which had some forty-five thousand volumes for inmates to choose from, plus a range of periodicals; and the six camp orchestras at Auschwitz/Birkenau, its theatrical performances, including a children’s opera, the weekly camp cinema, and even the special brothel established there.

Let’s hope they are shown postcards written from Auschwitz, some of which still exist, where the postman would collect the mail twice-weekly. Thus the past may not always be quite, as we were told.
– Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom

So I ask again, why would you provide these if Auschwitz was simply an extermination camp?

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

A lot of these pictures were sourced HERE

In 1972, a 29-year-old rock star began a very public “relationship” with a 14-year-old girl named Lori Mattix.

She was a child. He was nearly 30. The “relationship” reportedly continued for roughly two years.

That rock star was Jimmy Page, guitarist and founder of Led Zeppelin.

And then you go back and listen to the music:

Cause I got a little schoolgirl, and she’s all mine
I can’t get through to her ‘cause it doesn’t permit
But I’m gonna give her everything I’ve got to give

I mean, seriously. How much more obvious can it get?

These guys weren’t exactly hiding what they were into. They were singing about underage girls while molesting underage girls.

In 1984, a 47-year-old rockstar began a “relationship” with 13-year-old Mandy Smith. In a truly horrific case of systemic abuse, grooming and rape, he even moved Smith into his mansion.

Smith said she was still a virgin when she met him.

And somehow, all of this was happening in the orbit of one of the biggest rock bands on the planet.

That rock star was Bill Wyman, bassist for the Rolling Stones.

Then you read the Rolling Stones’ lyrics:

I know you're no scare-eyed honey
There'll be a feast if you just come upstairs, but
It's no hanging matter
It's no capital crime
I can see that you're fifteen years old
No, I don't want your I.D
And I can see that you're so far from home, but
That's no hanging matter
It's no capital crime

And again, you see these bands openly boasting about their sexual proclivities to millions of people.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

This rockstar has a long and disturbing history of pedophilia and pursuing underage girls.

He statutorily raped 15-year-old Rae Dawn Chong, the daughter of famous comedian Tommy Chong, when he was 33 years old.

He wrote “Stray Cat Blues,” where he sings about having sex with an underage girl and bringing her underage friend along for a threesome.

And he’s also all over the Epstein files, which speaks for itself.

That rockstar is Mick Jagger of The Rolling Stones.

Brown sugar, how come you taste so good? Uh huh
Brown sugar, just like a young girl should

I don’t know why anybody was surprised to find Mick Jagger in the Epstein files. The guy sang about underage girls for decades, and people made him a superstar.

This rockstar was 35-years-old when he began a “relationship” with a 15-year-old girl.

And much like the previously mentioned rockstars, his interest in underage girls also made its way into the music. He co-wrote “Mexicali Blues,” a song that describes sexually abusing a 14-year-old girl.

That rockstar was Bob Weir of the Grateful Dead.

Once again, this wasn’t some secret buried in a police file decades later. A famous adult rockstar was openly involved with a 15-year-old girl while singing about the sexual abuse of a 14-year-old, and his career continued as if there was nothing disturbing about any of it.

Most infamous of all, in 1959, an incredibly famous 24-year-old rock star stationed with the U.S. Army in Germany met his future wife when she was just 14 years old.

After he left Germany, the two continued writing love letters to each other before eventually resuming their relationship in person when she moved to America.

Let’s call that what it was: A grown man writing love letters to a 14-year-old girl was the 1959 version of grooming a child online. The technology was different. The grooming was not.

That rock star was Elvis Presley.

He wasn’t even just accused of grooming Priscilla, he admitted to it.

But he was Elvis Presley, so behavior that would have made an ordinary 24-year-old man a predator was somehow tolerated, excused and eventually romanticized as one of the most famous love stories in American pop culture.

These were some of the most famous musicians on the planet, and much of what you just read was happening right out in the open. And decades later, nothing has changed. If anything, the Epstein files have shown us just how easily powerful and famous people can continue to operate in these circles while the public looks the other way.

So I’m curious: how much of this did you already know? And now that you do, will you still listen to their music?

Comment below some other musicians you think belong in Part Three.

And if you missed Part One, you can read it here. It’s completely free and covers five more rockstars and their involvement with underage girls.

Relevant Reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

This is one of the most high-profile pedophiles to come out of Hollywood: Mark Salling from the hit TV show Glee.

Salling was best known for playing Noah “Puck” Puckerman from 2009-15 on Glee. He also famously dated his co-star Naya Rivera, who later died under tragic circumstances.

From the outside looking in, Salling appeared to be another successful Hollywood actor. He had money, fame, millions of fans and a starring role on one of the biggest television shows in America. What was going on behind closed doors, however, was far darker than the image being sold to the public.

So let’s flash back and go through the details of his case, but before we do, there’s something extremely important I want to address.

I’ve said this before, but I’ll say it again: I don’t believe there is such a thing as a “normal” Hollywood actor, just like I don’t believe there are many “normal” politicians. Frankly, I’m never shocked when an actor or politician is exposed as a pedophile because I’m of the opinion that most, if not all of them, are. Dark secrets in your closet make you incredibly easy to control, especially when exposing those secrets would destroy your career, your reputation and potentially put you in prison.

And what darker secret could someone possibly have than abusing children?

Now let’s get into Mark Salling’s case.

Sexual Assault Allegations

Salling’s legal problems began in January 2013, when his ex-girlfriend, Roxanne Gorzela, sued him for sexual battery, assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence. She accused Salling of forcing her to have unprotected sex with him in March 2011.

According to court documents, Gorzela later went to Salling’s home to confront him and allegedly found him in bed with another woman. She claimed the two got into an argument and that Salling pushed her to the ground, causing her to hit her head.

The case never went to trial. Gorzela eventually dropped the sexual battery claim, and Salling agreed to pay her approximately $2.7 million.

Then, in 2016, another allegation surfaced. According to court documents, a woman alleged that she entered a room with Salling in 2012 intending to have sex with him, but changed her mind and told him no. She claimed Salling refused to stop and forced himself on her.

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office ultimately declined to prosecute the case, citing insufficient evidence.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Child Sexual Abuse Material

This is where the story takes a much darker turn.

In 2015, while Glee was still one of the most recognizable television shows in America, something far more disturbing involving Mark Salling came to light.

On December 29, Salling was arrested at his Los Angeles home after investigators discovered child sexual abuse material in his possession.

He was released on $20,000 bail, but investigators continued going through the electronic devices and hard drives seized from his home.

What they uncovered was staggering: More than 25,000 images and 600 videos depicting child pornography on computers and thumb drives that belonged to Salling. The content depicted children as young as 3 years old being abused.

We’re talking about an enormous collection of child sexual abuse material.

Months after the initial discovery, Salling was formally charged with receiving and possessing child sexual abuse material. He later pleaded guilty, and under the plea agreement, prosecutors and his attorneys agreed to a prison sentence of four to seven years.

On January 30, 2018, just weeks before he was scheduled to be sentenced, Mark Salling committed suicide. Authorities determined that he had hanged himself near his home in Los Angeles.

How many other Hollywood actors have been discovered to be a pedophile?

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

I keep my news, investigations, and analysis free and accessible to everyone. If you value my work, your support makes it possible for me to keep doing it. Please like, comment, share, and subscribe.

Trigger warning: extremely graphic images and disturbing content.

In 2012, eight human heads were discovered at the Detroit airport.

They had arrived from Tel Aviv and were being transported unembalmed, stuffed inside trash bags and sitting in a cooler full of blood. These heads were even infected with HIV or hepatitis.

As disturbing as that sounds, the eight heads were only the beginning.

The discovery eventually led federal investigators to a warehouse in Detroit where they recovered approximately 1,200 human heads, four human fetuses, and other body parts.

The fetuses, which appeared to have been in their second trimester, were submerged in a liquid that included human brain tissue.

The warehouse belonged to Arthur Rathburn, a body broker running a multimillion-dollar business buying, dismembering, renting and selling human remains.

And when investigators got inside, they found something out of a horror movie.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

The Warehouse of Horrors

Human remains were stacked on top of each other inside freezers. Body parts were stored in paint cans. Rathburn used a chainsaw to dismember bodies before packaging and selling the pieces to ‘customers.’

Those human remains were rented and sold throughout the United States and shipped internationally to Mexico, Canada, Italy, Greece and Israel.

And this is where the story starts getting even more disturbing, if that’s even possible…

Rathburn ran this atrocious operation through his company, International Biological Inc., or IBI.

IBI didn’t just magically come into possession of all these bodies. It was buying human remains from another organization called the Biological Resource Center, or BRC, which operated facilities in Illinois and Arizona.

The Biological Resource Center (BRC) in Phoenix, Arizona, operated as a gruesome "human chop shop" that deceptively harvested and sold donated human body parts for profit.

In 2014, the FBI raided the Phoenix facility and uncovered horrific conditions inside:

• Piles of unlabelled body parts.

• A bucket containing human heads and coolers filled with male genitalia.

• A morbid “Frankenstein” specimen consisting of a large torso with a mismatched head sewn onto it.

• Tools like chainsaws and band saws used for careless dismemberment.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

This was truly a scene that was more akin to a horror movie than a scientific establishment. The FBI discovered 10 tons of frozen human remains, amounting to 1,755 body parts.

This chilling inventory included:

• 281 heads

• 241 shoulders

• 337 legs

• 97 spines

All stored in conditions that were grossly inappropriate and disrespectful​​ to the deceased.

Human remains from the Biological Resource Center (BRC) ended up directly in the hands of the U.S. Army for ‘military testing.’ The U.S. military used these bodies (without consent from the donors or their families) for taxpayer-funded research projects designed to measure the damage caused by roadside bombs and IEDs.

The most infamous example was Doris Stauffer, an elderly great-grandmother who passed away after battling Alzheimer's disease. Her son, Jim Stauffer, donated her body to BRC specifically hoping her brain could be studied by neurologists to better understand Alzheimer’s. On the paperwork, he explicitly checked the "no" box prohibiting her body from being used for military, traffic-safety, or non-medical testing. Instead, BRC severed one of Doris's hands, cremated it, and sent those ashes to her son. They then sold the rest of her body to the U.S. Army for $5,893. Her son only discovered what happened years later when a Reuters reporter investigated the facility's records.

This truly doesn’t even scratch the surface as to how horrific this ‘operation’ was in Phoenix. As a result of the raid, this facility was permanently shut down in 2014, and in 2019, the company was ordered to pay $58.5 million in damages to 10 of the family members who testified in court against them.

So, this is the company that was supplying Rathburn with the body parts that he was selling worldwide. That’s certainly comforting. I mean seriously, how many facilities like this exist worldwide?

Now Let’s Rewind To The Eight Human Heads Found In The Detroit Airport…

Rathburn had shipped these decomposing human heads to the International Dental Study Center in Tel Aviv. But Tel Aviv sent all eight heads back to Detroit, unembalmed, stuffed into trash bags full of blood, without notifying authorities.

So who exactly were these human heads being sent to?

The package itself gives us a name: Dr. Milli Raviv.

Raviv, along with her husband and son, runs a dental and medical practice headquartered in Montreal, with an office in Israel. Dr. Raviv is an Israeli Jew who graduated from Tel Aviv University before moving to Montreal.

Which raises another question: why does a Canadian-based medical practice also have an office in Israel?

Between 2010 and 2011, Rathburn was stopped twice by federal agents while returning from Montreal. Both times, he was carrying ten human heads. In total, there were six border crossings between 2010 and 2013.

In a 2012 shipment, agents found something else among the human remains: a severed penis.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Despite everything authorities had already encountered, Rathburn's warehouse wasn't raided until December 2013. In the meantime, he continued acquiring bodies, selling and renting out human remains, and moving body parts through his operation.

Dr. Milli Raviv was living in Montreal during this same period, running the Raviv Dental Center and serving as an assistant professor at McGill University. She also operated a private dental academy that advertised hands-on training using human cadavers.

When the eight heads were discovered, Dr. Raviv claimed she didn't know they were improperly packaged or diseased, and stated that her school maintained “high standards.”

But we’re talking about eight human heads that she sent to the United States unembalmed, stuffed into trash bags and surrounded by blood.

Raviv was the Israeli point of contact for the shipment of human heads. This woman has a medical degree. She knew exactly what she was looking at.

And yet neither the United States nor Canada pursued an investigation of the Raviv family, despite the shipment of human heads being specifically addressed to Milli Raviv and despite her connections to the world of body brokers and cadaver-based medical training. She still provides cadaver courses today.

On the other hand, Rathburn and his wife Elizabeth were arrested in 2016, 6 years after the initial raid and were sentenced to 9 years in federal prison.

Hmm…I wonder if the Raviv’s being a wealthy, well-connected, Jewish-Israeli family has anything to do with the lack of scrutiny? Or maybe it’s because a lot of these body parts ended up in the hands of the U.S. military? Or is it all of the above?

Think of Rathburn as an Epstein-type figure: a supplier and fixer operating inside a much larger network. And just like Epstein, Rathburn became the face of the scandal and the guy who took the fall, while the larger network of suppliers and clients walked away scot-free, and the illegal harvesting and trafficking of human bodies and body parts continues to this day.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

For pure murderous evil, there has never been a force to compare with Communism and Leon Trotsky…never before or since did one people construct a vast industry of death for the sole purpose of rounding up and destroying every single member of another people. The Jewish Bolshevik under orders and overseen by Trotsky, killed so many Europeans the death toll surpasses 100 million.

-Jeff Jacoby The Boston Globe December 7, 1995 ⁣

Most people hear the word “Nazi” and immediately think of a sadistic, mass-murdering regime responsible for some of the worst atrocities in modern history. Whether you agree with that assessment or not is not what I’m debating here. I’ve already produced numerous pieces digging into the history of World War II and challenging most, if not all of the story we were taught in school.

So put all of that aside for a moment. Let’s accept, for the sake of this article, exactly what we were taught in history class about the Nazis.

Then I have a question.

Why were we never taught about the tens of millions (mainly Christians) who were imprisoned, tortured, starved, worked to death, and executed under the Jewish-Bolshevik regime from 1917-1953?

If we were taught to associate Nazis with sadistic mass murderers, then by that same standard, the Bolsheviks far exceed that definition. Especially once you start digging into where the leading Bolsheviks came from, the networks behind the ‘Russian’ revolution, and who was truly behind the rise of the Nazis in Germany, the history we were taught starts looking a hell of a lot less complete.

One of the most sadistic and ruthless figures to emerge from the Bolshevik Revolution was Lev Bronstein, better known to history as Leon Trotsky.

He often executed his victims personally and even ordered the murder of children. His role in the bloodshed during this period is extensively documented in Russian archival records.

Trotsky is best known as the founder of the Red Army, as well as his criminal role in the Holodomor genocides against Europe.

The Red Army’s torture squad was controlled by Trotsky while the state itself was headed by Lenin. As head of the military wing, Trotsky had Lenin’s authorization to mobilize state forces against the people, and he did so to devastating effect. What followed was a horrific cycle of crucifixions, scalpings and other “bestial tortures”. Eyes were poked out, tongues cut off, and victims were buried alive.

Shootings carried out by the Jewish Cheka (secret police) were commonplace and some of the torture attributed to its officers were almost unimaginably sadistic. They were notorious for cutting open a victim’s stomach, pulling out a length of small intestine, nailing it to a telegraph pole, and then whipping the victim and forcing them to run circles around the pole until the intestine completely unraveled.

To emphasize Trotsky’s utter disdain for the European people, in 1921, messengers representing starving Europeans approached him begging for help. His response was chilling:

You are starving? This is not famine yet. When your woman start eating their children then you may come and say we are starving.

Trotsky intentionally drove Europeans to cannibalism. Officers and their families were executed for disobeying orders. His cruelness and mercilessness became the defining feature of Bolshevik power.

For those who believe the horrors of Bolshevik cruelty belong solely to some forgotten chapter of history, think again. How comforting is it to know that a direct descendant of Leon Trotsky now holds a powerful position within the United States government and has even been photographed in the Oval Office with the president of the United States?

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

The great-granddaughter of Jewish-Bolshevik leader, Leon Trotsky, is the Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Nora Volkow has been a high-ranking member of the NIH since the days of the Bush Administration.

And because they want to rub it in our faces just a little more, here’s Donald Trump in the Oval Office alongside Nora Volkow, the Jewish great-granddaughter of Bolshevik and Communist leader Leon Trotsky, a man whose policies set the stage for the deaths of well over 60 million Christians.

I’ll connect the dots for you…

The people who started and funded the ‘Russian’ Revolution weren’t Russian, they were Jewish.

These same connections can be traced to who is responsible for WWII and the ‘Holocaust.’

And through Operation Paperclip, these ‘Nazis’ were given new identities and secretly smuggled into the United States and then placed into positions of power inside of the government, NASA and the military.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

The information I’m about to relay is 100% factual and corroborated by an overwhelming amount of evidence. Perhaps the most intriguing part of this story is that every single person reading this post was alive when it became news in 2004.

That matters because somehow, despite the magnitude of what happened, most of you have either never heard this story or forgot about it. I’m betting on the former because this story is truly unforgettable. Once you hear the entire thing, I can promise you that you’ll never forget the name Marc Dutroux.

The Background

Dutroux was born in Belgium in 1956. He was twice convicted of kidnapping and raping underage children. The first time was in 1989. The second time occurred in 1996.

And no, that is not a typo.

Dutroux had already been convicted of kidnapping and raping children. He was sentenced to 13 years in prison, but served only three and a half before being released for “good behavior.”

A man convicted of kidnapping and raping children was back on the streets after three and a half years.

Less than a decade later, he was arrested again for the same kind of crimes, only this time there were different victims and some of those children were dead.

In the second case, Dutroux was convicted of kidnapping, imprisoning, torturing and sexually abusing children, some of whom died in captivity.

What I’m about to tell you comes from statements made by surviving victims and witnesses, including material commonly referred to as the “X-files”; statements made by Marc Dutroux himself and evidence collected by law enforcement.

Keep that in mind as you read what comes next because this story gets far more disturbing from here.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Here We Go…

Dutroux confessed to kidnapping, raping, drugging, torturing and filming children for many years. He also claimed he was doing it at the behest of a political elite who financed his career as a professional trafficker.

And according to Dutroux, these elites weren’t just financing what he was doing, they were making specific requests of him.

Sometimes they requested specific types of children. They called them “party favors,” and Dutroux was asked to deliver children of a certain age, sex and race. Other times, they requested specific methods of torturing the children to fulfill their demented desires, including orgies, torture games and satanic rituals involving sacrifices.

And sometimes they requested that Dutroux film certain influential people engaged in these acts so the footage could later be used as blackmail.

He claimed that many of his customers and financiers were world leaders.

Given where all of this was happening, that claim was not exactly a stretch of the imagination. Dutroux lived in Belgium, home to the headquarters of both NATO and the European Union, placing him right in the middle of one of the most politically powerful centers in the world.

This statement was also corroborated by victims who were able to identify specific politicians.

Anneke Lucas was one of the victims who later testified about what had happened to her. According to Lucas, she was only six years old when, in 1969, a cleaning lady hired by her mother sold her into the pedophile network.

And the claims she went on to make were extraordinary…

• Before she even turned 12 years old, she had been raped for more than 1,700 hours.

• She was only six years old when she was forced to participate in her first orgy where she was made to wear an iron dog collar and eat human excrement.

• From time to time, she would actually be delivered back to her parents. However, her parents themselves were complicit in what was happening and repeatedly sent her back to her abusers.

• She described torture that included being strapped to a butcher’s block that she said was used to execute other children. She also claimed that other victims were forced to torture her for hours as part of their initiation.

• Because she was considered attractive, she was preferred by her abusers. She claimed she tried to use that to her advantage however she could in order to survive, but by the age of eleven, she had become so broken that she was slated to be executed and disposed of.

• The only reason she survived was because one of her abusers negotiated for her freedom. That same abuser would later sit as a defendant in the trial.

Other witnesses and victims would soon come forward with similarly horrifying accounts, describing “Black Masses” where they said children and adults were sacrificed in front of observers and participants, including prominent politicians and other powerful figures.

Later, those claims would be corroborated after police discovered a note inside the home of Bernard Weinstein, a man who had previously worked with Dutroux before Dutroux murdered him.

The letter contained very specific requests for certain types of victims to be used in satanic sacrifices.

The letter was signed by a man calling himself “Anubis.” Police would later discover that “Anubis” was Francis Desmet, the high priest of a satanic cult known as “Abrasax.”

Police obtained a warrant and searched the property where they seized computers, documents, mail, human skulls, jars of blood and an assortment of satanic items.

And yet, despite everything the police found, none of it was enough to result in an arrest.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

The Dutroux Trial

As the Dutroux case became public, other victims began stepping forward with accounts that corroborated the testimony already being given, describing sexual abuse and human sacrifice.

They also described something they called “hunting parties,” where elites would release naked children into the woods and force them to hide before hunting them down and slaughtering them.

And let’s not forget what was reported just last year about the ‘human safaris’ that took place during the war in Bosnia in the 1990s. Wealthy individuals, mostly from Western Europe and other regions, traveled to the front lines on weekends to hunt and shoot defenseless civilians, with some accounts claiming tiered pricing based on whether the target was a child, woman, or man.

Anyways, back to Dutroux.

Many of the victims’ accounts contained strikingly similar details that they were impossible to deny. For example, they repeatedly described these hunting parties as taking place on the grounds of castles, where the victims were isolated from the public and had virtually no way to escape.

Children who were not killed during the hunt were often chased down by Dobermans and mauled to death.

All of these victims echoed the testimony of other, older survivors who had come forward with remarkably similar accounts of satanic ritual abuse from around the world.

Then There’s The Money…

Dutroux was unemployed.
He received roughly $1,200 a month in public assistance.

Yet he owned 10 homes valued at approximately $6 million.

Documents later released by WikiLeaks also showed large sums of money, in multiple currencies, being deposited into his wife’s bank account. Even more notable was the timing: those deposits coincided with kidnappings and reports of missing children.

Marc Dutroux's wife, Michelle Martin, was convicted as an accomplice in his horrific crimes. In 2004, she was sentenced to 30 years in prison for helping Dutroux kidnap and imprison young girls and for complicity in the deaths of two eight-year-old victims, who starved to death in a hidden cellar while Dutroux was briefly jailed for another offense.

To nobody’s surprise, she was granted an early release and only served 16 years of her 30-year sentence.

Then there was Judge Jean-Marc Connerotte.

Before he was removed from the case, Connerotte was reportedly on the verge of publicly disclosing the names of high-level government officials who had been recognized on videotapes depicting sexual torture inside Dutroux’s dungeon.

And don’t forget about the witnesses.

Twenty potential witnesses connected to the case died without explanation.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Does any of this sound familiar?

Tell me you haven’t watched eerily similar headlines play out in real time over the last few years…

Powerful people.
Trafficked children.
Satanic rituals.
Money that doesn’t make sense.
Witnesses who never make it to the stand.

And that’s exactly why I’m telling you this story. Not one single thing in this article is theory. It’s all proven and on record.

Millions of people around the world are talking about Epstein as if he were some kind of anomaly. He wasn’t. This epidemic did not start with Jeffrey Epstein, it did not end with Jeffrey Epstein, and it sure as hell was never confined to one island.

Epstein was the low-hanging fruit, the one they were willing to sacrifice while everyone above him, at the highest levels of power, remained protected.

Suddenly, the claims that world leaders and governments could be involved in this satanic horror show don’t sound quite so far-fetched anymore.

Suddenly, questioning whether international organizations that claim to fight these crimes, including the UN and its agencies, might instead be enabling, covering up or even participating in them doesn’t sound so crazy either.

And that’s when the whole house of cards starts coming down.

This one case alone should be enough to silence anyone who insists these things simply could never happen.

For crying out loud, this trial happened in 2004. Do you remember it? If you don’t, ask yourself why a case this horrifying wasn’t front-page news across the world and burned into everyone’s memory.

And if you’re asking yourself, HOW DO THESE PEOPLE KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS? Have you not figured it out yet?

The very people who are supposed to stop it are the ones doing it.

The judges, the lawyers, the cops, the FBI, and everyone in between - they’re all in on it.

You will not believe who is involved, how deep this goes, or how far they’ll go to protect their secrets.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Sources:

• Confronting an Atrocity

• Belgium Pedophilia Scandal /Did Authorities Cover Up Its Scope?

• Paedophile Marc Dutroux and the horror case that united a divided Belgium

• Belgium’s silent heart of darkness

• Marc Dutroux: The Monster of Belgium

The early 20th-century so-called “Trust” model, utilized by the Soviet Union to infiltrate and destroy its enemies, is the foundation for the very techniques often used by American intelligence agencies, along with the Mossad and its conduits, such as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith.

These techniques are used to infiltrate and destroy, or otherwise control the activities of domestic dissident movements deemed hostile to the interests of Zionism and Globalism.

Those who fail to understand this age-old tactic will never be able to fathom the extent to which the American political system has been manipulated by these demonic forces.

Although, even today, there are persons and organizations active within the so-called “pro-Palestine”, “anti-Zionism”, and “free speech” movements in America who seem to “say the right things”, the truth is that many of those in question are actually witting, and sometimes unwitting, agents of discord.

They are being used for the purposes of intelligence gathering, propaganda, and disinformation, all designed to establish further influence upon the American system for the purpose of consolidating the power of The Enemy Within.

Let us examine the Soviet “Trust” and how it operated. This little-known counterintelligence operation referred to as “the Trust” was established by the Cheka, the predecessor to the Soviet KGB as a means through which to set up and control a “phony opposition” in order to flush out genuine opponents of the Bolshevik regime which, as historians know, was under the control of Jews.

When reading the following materials relating to the workings of the “Trust,” simply substitute the word “Israeli” for “Soviet” and the word “Mossad” for the names “Cheka” and “KGB.”

You will then understand how the “Trust” technique has been applied by the Mossad in manipulating groups that “seem” to be opposing Israeli interests. Likewise, a similar formula can be used by substituting the terms “CIA” or “FBI,” as appropriate.

A brief description of the operation of “The Trust” appears in Chekisty: A History of the KGB by John J. Dziak:

Where no genuine internal opposition organization exists [a security service might] invent one—both to infiltrate the more dangerous . . . organizations abroad in order to blunt or channel their actions, and to surface real or potential internal dissidents. If an internal opposition already exists, it will be infiltrated in an attempt to control it, to provoke opponents into exposing themselves, and to cause the movement to serve state interests.

A more comprehensive account of “The Trust” appears in Dirty Tricks or Trump Cards: U.S. Covert Action and Counterintelligence, by Georgetown University Professor Roy Godson who is known for his close ties to the Israeli lobby in Washington:

Sometimes, if circumstances allow and the practitioners are skillful, counterintelligence can target its deception not only at the internal and emigre opposition but also at the intelligence services and governments of foreign adversaries. The Soviet Trust was such an operation.

The Trust was created in the early 1920s and completely controlled by the Soviet secret service, the Cheka. Believing they were operating in league with an active and effective anti-Bolshevik movement, opponents of the regime within the USSR and in exile were lured by the Trust into exposing themselves and became targets of Soviet state security.

Using that information and controlling communications between Western intelligence agencies, the Russian emigre community, and Russian dissidents inside the country, the Cheka expertly neutralized anti-Communist opposition at home and abroad.

The Trust was also able to use its contacts with Western intelligence services to pass along misleading and false information on the internal state of the Soviet regime to those same services’ foreign ministries and governments.
Essentially, the West was being told by its intelligence “assets” within the Soviet Union that support for the Bolshevik regime was weakening, and that the Soviet leaders were at heart nationalists who, if left in peace by the West, would gradually turn a state dedicated to revolution at home and abroad into one that would behave in a more traditional and predictable fashion . . .

The organization’s actual name was the Moscow Municipal Credit Association—thus, the Trust. It posed as a financial institution operating within the liberal economic environment of Lenin’s New Economic Policy. One ironic aspect of the Trust operation was that British and French intelligence services were paying the Russian emigres for the disinformation being supplied to them by the Cheka through the Trust. Allegedly, at one point, money paid to these sources by the West was used to cover the expenses of the deception operation itself. In short, the West was paying to be deceived.

Given the fact that several generations of young KGB officers were shown that Trust operations were successful, it is not surprising that such operations were continued from the 1920s to the 1980s.

The “Trust” model for infiltration has been applied by the Mossad and its allies in the CIA and the FBI in this country to other dissident movements targeted for infiltration and take-over. Intelligence units such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are often part of the operation.

Careful study of recent ADL and SPLC bulletins will frequently (but not always) reveal precisely which “dissident” groups and leaders are being utilized (and promoted) to collect names and assemble dossiers on perceived or potential threats. The ADL and SPLC give a big “build-up” to their own controlled agents so as to give them “credibility.”

In other words, the average person will assume that because the ADL and SPLC happen to be attacking an individual or organization, that is somehow “proof” that the individual or organization is legitimate, as evidenced by the ADL or SPLC attacks.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

How This Plays Out Today

It’s paramount that you understand this: just because the mainstream media runs a “hit piece” on an “independent” journalist does not prove that the journalist is truly against the Establishment. If anything, the attention itself should make you even more suspicious.

The people running these organizations understand perfectly well how psychology works. They know that relentlessly demonizing somebody can make the average person more curious about them. Tell millions of Americans that someone is dangerous, forbidden, crazy, or someone they absolutely should NOT listen to, and what do you think happens? People immediately want to know what this person is saying that they supposedly aren’t supposed to hear.

You already know this from basic human nature. When somebody tells you NOT to do something or tells you what you’re NOT supposed to read, watch, or believe, doesn’t that make you more curious?

So wouldn’t it actually be more useful for the mainstream media to completely IGNORE somebody whose information and ideology they genuinely do not want spreading?

Why give that person millions of dollars worth of free publicity? Couldn’t they also use their extensive influence and power to have that person removed from social media entirely? Or, if that person truly posed such an enormous threat to powerful interests, simply kill them?

Yes, that certainly would make more sense, wouldn’t it?

But instead, they repeatedly put these “independent” journalists in front of millions of Americans, demonize them, make people curious about them, and inevitably push an enormous new audience directly into their arms.

Why?

Because the purpose isn’t actually to stop you from listening to them. It’s to push millions of Americans toward carefully positioned “independent” journalists as a way to control the information that is disseminated.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

First section: Michael Collins Piper

The cover-up is arguably the most important part of the 9/11 terror atrocity because whoever controls the story afterward controls what the American public believes happened and, more importantly, who they believe is responsible.

That’s why the narrative matters so much. If the people actually behind a terror operation can successfully pin the crime on someone else, they don’t just escape accountability. They can use the fear and anger created by the attack to convince millions of Americans to support whatever agenda the operation was intended to advance.

And that narrative can’t be thrown together after the fact. It has to be ready to go while people are still watching the buildings burn; terrified, furious, and looking for someone to blame.

That’s what makes the cover-up so essential.
The attack creates the crisis.
The false narrative tells the public what the crisis supposedly means and who they’re supposed to hate for it.

The most obvious part of the 9/11 agenda was the so-called “Global War on Terror.” Washington took the fear and rage of an entire country and used it to sell Americans a military campaign that dragged on for decades and cost trillions of dollars. The government spent years telling Americans these wars were necessary to keep us safe while sending young Americans halfway across the world to fight and die in countries most people couldn’t even find on a map. Trillions of taxpayer dollars disappeared into wars that produced very little tangible benefit for the average American, while defense contractors and politicians made fortunes and Washington kept finding another country to bomb or occupy.

That is how successful the 9/11 cover-up was. The government managed to take one of the most traumatic events in American history and turn it into a blank check for war. Americans were told to pay for it, send their sons and daughters to fight it, surrender more of their civil liberties in the name of it, and shut the hell up because questioning any of it supposedly meant you weren’t a patriot.

The people behind the 9/11 cover-up are clearly part of the same criminal network behind the terror atrocity itself.

Two of the highest-level masterminds behind the 9/11 crime and cover-up are former Israeli Prime Minister and military chief Ehud Barak and former Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff.

On 9/11, Ehud Barak was one of the first people to push the narrative that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the terror attacks and called for a U.S.-led Global War on Terror. He did so from the London studios of BBC World and Rupert Murdoch’s Sky News, all before the towers had fallen on September 11, 2001.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff was responsible for the federal investigation into 9/11 as head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. But Chertoff’s effort is better described as a “non-investigation” because rather than solving the crime, he and his department oversaw the immediate and massive destruction of evidence from crime scenes where nearly 3,000 people were murdered on 9/11.

The fact that Michael Chertoff sat on the board of advisors of Ehud Barak’s company, Carbyne, while Jeffrey Epstein invested millions of dollars into Barak’s enterprise is a solid line connecting the criminal network behind 9/11 with the Epstein sexual blackmail operation.

This is how it works. Epstein’s blackmail operation was designed to control politicians and other powerful agents of influence, which is exactly the kind of leverage you would need to maintain a high-level 9/11 cover-up for 25 years.

The fact that Epstein’s operation was supported by Leslie Wexner, a member of the Mega Group, is even more evidence that Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were working for an operation run at the highest levels of Israeli intelligence.

The Mega Group consists of U.S.-based Zionist billionaires dedicated to serving the state of Israel.

Mega Group was established in 1991 during the reign of the former terrorist leader Yitzhak Shamir as Israel’s prime minister.

As Gidi Weitz reported in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz on July 11, 2019:

The American billionaire financier Jeffrey Epstein, a registered sex offender who was arrested this week on new sex-trafficking charges involving underage girls, partnered with former Prime Minister Ehud Barak to invest in the former prime minister’s startup.

In 2015 Barak set up a limited partnership, in which he is the sole shareholder. That company invested in Reporty Homeland Security, established in 2014, becoming a major shareholder. Last year Reporty changed its name to Carbyne.

The company develops call-handling and identification capabilities for emergency response services.

Barak is the chairman of Carbyne and according to reports by [sic] business media outlets, his personal investment in the company totals millions of dollars in it. Haaretz has learned that Epstein financed a considerable part of the investment, thus becoming a partner in the project.1

What other crimes has the network surrounding Epstein been able to cover up? How many politicians and other powerful people have been compromised, and what have they been pressured to hide or support?

After everything we now know about Epstein, those are questions the public has every right to ask.

Relevant reading:

If you’re tired of being told everything is fine while it clearly isn’t, you’re exactly why this publication exists.

My work is 100% reader-supported. That means no advertisers, no political handlers, and no incentive to soften the truth.

I started this because too many people feel like they’re losing their minds trying to make sense of what’s happening, myself included. I wanted to build a space of like-minded people to make this journey feel less lonely for all of us.

To allow me to continue posting content just like this, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. I’m running a special for $40/year or $5/month.

If that price feels impossible to you, I understand. Share this article with everyone you know, it costs nothing but it matters more than you could possibly know.

This content is information the American ruling elite do NOT want you to have access to. If you appreciate work like this, and want more of it, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.